Itta/419/2012 Of Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation) v. Dr. K. Kalpana Reddy
High Court
24 Aug 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/419/2012 Of Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation) v. Dr. K. Kalpana Reddy
Date of order
24 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/419/2012 Of Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation) v. Dr. K. Kalpana Reddy, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Granting liberty as sought for, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.GANGA RAO
ITTA.NO.419 OF 2012
JUDGMENT:{Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan}
Sri B.Narasimha Sarma, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax, would submit that, in terms of CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018, all appeals, where the tax effect is below Rs.50,00,000/-, are required to be withdrawn and, as the value of the present appeal is less than Rs.50,00,000/-, the appellant may be permitted to withdraw the appeal. Learned counsel would further submit that liberty may be granted, in case it were to be found later that the subject matter of the appeal falls within the exceptions mentioned in the aforesaid Circular issued by the Central Board, to file an application for restoration of the appeal.
Granting liberty as sought for, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand dismissed.
_______________________________
(RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J)
____________________
(M.GANGA RAO, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.