Case Law › High Court › Itta/419/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itta/419/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-(Tds) v. M/S. Shriram Chits Pvt.ltd

High Court 17 Sep 2013 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

17 Sep 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/419/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-(Tds) v. M/S. Shriram Chits Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 64 of 2013 has beendismissed by this Court on 09.07.2013, we also dismiss this appeal. _____________________ K.J.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH ATHYDERABAD THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAAND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU I.T.T.A. No. 419 of 2013 DATE: 17.09.2013 Between: Commissioner of Income Tax-(TDS),Hyderabad. … Appellant AndM/s. Shriram Chits Pvt., Ltd.,Hyderabad. … Respondent This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU I.T.T.A. No. 419 of 2013 JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) Since connected appeal being I.T.T.A. No. 64 of 2013 has beendismissed by this Court on 09.07.2013, we also dismiss this appeal. _____________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ ________________K. C. BHANU, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.