Itta/420/2010 Of Andhra Pradesh Paper Mills Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax Cirlce 2(3)

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P,SAM KOSHYANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 420OF 2010 Appeal fited under Section 260(4) of the lncome-Tax Act., i961, against theorder dated 04.11.2005 passed in lTA,No 872lHydl2006 lor the assessment yearorder dated 04.11.2005 passed in lTA,No 872lHydl2006 lor the assessment year2002-2003 on the file of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad Bench [,A,]Hyderabad preferred against the Order dated 15.12.2005 passed in lTA. No.340lACl2(3)lClT(A)-lll/05-06 on the file of the Commissioner of lncome Tax(Appeals)-lll, Hyderabad preferred against the Assessment Order dated 14.03.200sHyderabad preferred against the Order dated 15.12.2005 passed in lTA. No.340lACl2(3)lClT(A)-lll/05-06 on the file of the Commissioner of lncome Tax(Appeals)-lll, Hyderabad preferred against the Assessment Order dated 14.03.200spassed in PAN/GIR No, AAACT8B490 on the file of the Assistant Commissioner of .lncome Tax, Circle- 3(3), Hyderabad.lncome Tax, Circle- 3(3), Hyderabad. Between: Andhra_Pradesh Paper Mills Limited, 501-509, Swapnalok Complex, g2l93, S.D.Road, Secunderabad-SOO 003 Rep. by its Director Shreeyash B'angur, S/o. L.N.Bangur, Aged 29 years, resident of Hyderabad. ...APPELLANT AND Assistant Commissioner of lncometax Circle 2(3),, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant : Mr. D. Pavan Kumar (Not present) Counsel for the Respondent : Sri P. Murali Krishna The Court delivered the following: nj . . .3; i I It THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM AND THE HON'BI,E SRI JUSTICE NARSING INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL [APPEAL No.42O OF 2OIO] JUDGMENT | fuer i* [n'bLe Sn ][Juslice ][Psam ][Koshy.)] Today, when the matter is taken up [for ][hearing, ][Ms.Sagarika]Koneru, learned counsel appearing under the [instructions ][of]Mr.D.Pavan Kumar, learned counsel [for ][the ][appellant informed the]Bench that the appellant has obtained [and ][brief ][from ][their ][office.]2. On the previous date of hearing, the [matter ][left ][un-attended by]either in person or by duly engaged counsel. 3. Today alsb, inspite of repeated calls, there [is ][no ][representation]on behalf of the appellant. It appears that [the ][appellant ][has ][lost]interest in the litigation.4. In view of the same, this Bench is left [with no ][other ][option, ][but]to dismiss the appeal for want [of ][prosecution. Accordingly, the ][instant]appeal stands dismissed for non [prosecution.] As a sequel, miscellaneous applications [pending ]if [any, ][shall]stand closed. Sd/. K. NT REGISTRAR\--.--fr.(T'\SECTION //TRUE [COPY/'] \ 1. The [lncome ][Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad Bench ]['A' ][Hyderabad'](nbpeats)-tll [Hvderabad']2. The [Commissionet ]";;;";;iax 3. The [Assistant ][corn''ttiin'";i ][l";# ][Tax ][circle- ][3(3)' Hyderabad'];. il b;;Mr. [Pavan ][Kumar' ][Advocate ][!9!ycr];'iliii"s,iP,tVluraliKrishna,Advocate[oPUC]6. Two [CoPies](nbpeats)-tll [Hvderabad']2. The [Commissionet ]";;;";;iax 3. The [Assistant ][corn''ttiin'";i ][l";# ][Tax ][circle- ][3(3)' Hyderabad'];. il b;;Mr. [Pavan ][Kumar' ][Advocate ][!9!ycr];'iliii"s,iP,tVluraliKrishna,Advocate[oPUC]6. Two [CoPies] To, DL/sh @* HIGH COURT DATED:1710212O25 JUDGMENTITTA.No.420 of 20101$aSTA16:QtJco?II'lAR [2025]IDr'-. .. ' APPEAL IS DISMISiSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION