Itta/420/2017 Of Prl Commr Of Income Tax-2, Hyderabad v. M/S Hyd Menzies Air Cargo [P] Ltd., Ranga Reddy Dist
High Court
11 Jul 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/420/2017 Of Prl Commr Of Income Tax-2, Hyderabad v. M/S Hyd Menzies Air Cargo [P] Ltd., Ranga Reddy Dist
Date of order
11 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
2010-11
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/420/2017 Of Prl Commr Of Income Tax-2, Hyderabad v. M/S Hyd Menzies Air Cargo [P] Ltd., Ranga Reddy Dist, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of [the ][above, ][this ][appeal ][is ][dismissed ][on]withdrawal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
MONDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYANANDTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 420 OF 2017
Appeal under Section 260 A of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 against orderdated 06-10-2016 in l.T.A. No. 422 lhydl2015 on the file of the Court of thelncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad ["B' ]Bench, Hyderabad , AssessmentYear 2010-2011 preferred against the order dated 23-02-2015 in lT.A.No.0148lAC-2(2) /ClT (A) -2 12012-13 on the file of the Commissioner of lncome Tax( Appeals )-2, Hyderabad preferred against the order of the AssistantCommissioner of lncome Tax Circle 2 (2) , Hyderabad dated 3'1-01-2013 [in]PAN /GlR No. AACCC961 1N
Between:
Pr. Commissioner of lncome Tax -2 , Hyderabad
...APPELLANT
AND
M/s. Hyderabad Menzies Air Cargo[P] [Ltd., ], [Air Cargo Terminal, Rajiv Gandhi]lnternational Airport, Shamshabad,Ranga Reddy District.
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant: Ms. K MAMATA CHOUDARYS.C FOR INCOME-TAX DEPT
Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. CHALLA GUNARANJAN
The Court delivered the following: Judgment
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHIIYANAND
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
ITTA No.42O of 2OL7
JUDGMENT: eer thc Hon,bte the Chief Justice Ujjat Bhugotl)
Heard Ms. K.Mamta Choudary, learned SeniorStanding Counsel for Income Tax Department appearingfor the appellant and Mr. Challa Gunaranjan, learnedcounsel for the respondent.
2. This appeal has been filed against the order datedO6.LO.2O|6 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,,8,, Hyderabad Bench Hyderabad inI.T.A.No.422 /Hyd/2015 for the assessment year 2010-11.
3. The appeal lr,as admitted for hearing on IO.OZ.2OI7.4. Today learned counsel for the appellant submits thaton an application liled by the respondent under the DirectTax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2O2O, the matter has beensettled between the parties follorving which fuli and final
settlemellt dues [have been ][paid by the ][respondent']Therefore, appellant [would like ][to ][withdraw the ][appeal']
5. In view of [the ][above, ][this ][appeal ][is ][dismissed ][on]withdrawal.
6. Miscellaneous applications [pending, ][if ][any, ][shall]stand closed. [However, ][thcre ][shall ][be ][no order ][as ][to ][costs']
To
//TRUE COPY//
SD/-B.S.CHIRANJEEVIJOINT REGISTRAR'.. 4P1+\..\, SECTTON OFFICER
bs
1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad "B" Bench,Hyderabad.Hyderabad.
2. The Commissioner of lncome Tax ( Appeals )-2, Hyderabad
3. The HyderabadAssistant Commissioner of lncome Tax Circle 2 (2) ,
4. One CC to Ms. K MAMATA CHOUDARY, S.C for lncome -tax Dept
5. One CC to Mr. CHALLA GUNARANJAN Advocate
6. Two CD Copies
7. One Spare Copy\ff\\ff\
HIGH COURT
DATED:1110712022
JUDGMENTz/\ i .l::?)ek.il.ITTA.No.420 of 2017$Joo[ [ riir la:l{.\.iLr,i1
DISMISSING THtl I,fTA AS WITHDRAWN.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.