Itta/423/2013 Of The Commissioner Of The Income Tax Iv v. Satya Prasad Anagani
High Court
18 Sep 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/423/2013 Of The Commissioner Of The Income Tax Iv v. Satya Prasad Anagani
Date of order
18 Sep 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/423/2013 Of The Commissioner Of The Income Tax Iv v. Satya Prasad Anagani, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRAPRADESH AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OFSEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICESRI KALYAN JYOTI SEN GUPTA
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
I.T.T.A. No.423 OF 2013
Between:
The Commissioner of Income Tax-II,Hyderabad
..... Appellant
AND
Satya Prasad Anagani
.....Respondent
The Court made the following :
JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri K.J. Sengupta)
Since connected Appeal on identical questions oflaw has already been dismissed by this court, thepresent appeal is also dismissed. In any way, we
noticed that the learned Tribunal has estimated theincome discarding the Books of Accounts estimatingthe net profits at 15% from the business. Thispercentage of estimation is not absurd in the businesscarried out by the assessee. The agricultural income isalso estimated at Rs.5.00 lakhs instead of Rs.10.00lakhs. It is a question of fact. This appreciation of fact bythe learned Tribunal is not absurd. In view of this fact-finding, we do not find any element of law involved inthis appeal.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. No order asto costs.
______________________
Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, CJ.
September 18, 2013MAS
_____________K.C. Bhanu, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.