Case LawHigh Court › Itta/430/2010 Of Smt. Laxmi Bai v. The I...

Itta/430/2010 Of Smt. Laxmi Bai v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 06 Aug 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/430/2010 Of Smt. Laxmi Bai v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
06 Aug 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/430/2010 Of Smt. Laxmi Bai v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYOERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUSTTWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 430 OF 2010 Appeal under Section 2604 of the Income Tax Act against the order dated11-09-2009 in lTA.No.1279lHyd/2008 on the file of the lncome Tax AppellaleTribunal, B-Bench, Hyderabad. Between:Smt. Laxrhi Bai, 3-4-305, Tobacco Bazar Secunderabad...APPELLANTANDThe lncome Tax Officer, Ward-10(3), Hyderabad...RESPONDENTCounsel for the Appellant: Ms. Sagarika Koneru, counsel representingMr. Y. Ratnakar tCounsel for the Respondent: Ms. Bokaro Sapna Reddy,Senior Standing Counsel lncome Tax Department The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTI CE P.SAiI,I KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CII.!.LAPATHI RAO INCOME TAX TRIB UNAL APPBAL No.4.]0 of 2010 JUDCMENTT r1,,r tt,rt t,teSri Jyrricr.ts,rar A,,r/r.r Ms. Sagarika Koneru, learned counsel, represent in . NIr. y. Ratnakar,learned counsel lor the appellant. Ms' Bokaro S,pna Rcddy, Iearrccl Senior Standiur. |ourscl lor Income I{I'ax l)epartrrent appcarine on bchallol'rhc rcspondent.{I'ax l)epartrrent appcarine on bchallol'rhc rcspondent. 2. Ms. Sagarika Koneru, learned counsel, repres€ntir* Mr.. y. Ratnakar, leamed counsel for the appellant, submits that despite all r:lrb,1s there has beenno response flom the appellant's side. She, therefore, l)r'a r's that the presentappeal may be disnrissed, with liberty gr.nted to the appcllrrnt to approach theCourt in case the cause of action still survivcs. 3. Recording thc atbresaid subrnissi.. made by lrr. learned counselappearing on behall'of the appellant, thc instant appea) .trrnds dismissed forwant of prosecution resen,ing the right ol'the appellant 1o .evive the same in case il the appcllant is still aggrievcd o1- the irnpugned order [passed ]by [the] lncome 1ax Appellate Tribunal. No costs 4. As a seque[, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/- N. SRIHARIPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER To, 1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, B-Bench, Hyderabad. 2. One CC to Mr Y. RatnakarAdvocate 3. One CC to t\Is. Bokaro Sapna Reddy, Senior Standing Counsel lncome Tax3. One CC to t\Is. Bokaro Sapna Reddy, Senior Standing Counsel lncome Tax Department 4. Two CD Copies Kam/gh HIGH COURT DATED:0 610812025 JUDGMENTITTA.No.430 of 2010 DISMISSING OF THE APPEAL 6L0t? (a):(I7: sEP 20fr\-, ^ li"_- -)//' i
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan