Itta/430/2010 Of Smt. Laxmi Bai v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
06 Aug 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/430/2010 Of Smt. Laxmi Bai v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
06 Aug 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/430/2010 Of Smt. Laxmi Bai v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYOERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUSTTWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYAND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 430 OF 2010
Appeal under Section 2604 of the Income Tax Act against the order dated11-09-2009 in lTA.No.1279lHyd/2008 on the file of the lncome Tax AppellaleTribunal, B-Bench, Hyderabad.
Between:Smt. Laxrhi Bai, 3-4-305, Tobacco Bazar Secunderabad...APPELLANTANDThe lncome Tax Officer, Ward-10(3), Hyderabad...RESPONDENTCounsel for the Appellant: Ms. Sagarika Koneru, counsel representingMr. Y. Ratnakar tCounsel for the Respondent: Ms. Bokaro Sapna Reddy,Senior Standing Counsel lncome Tax Department
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTI CE P.SAiI,I KOSHY
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CII.!.LAPATHI RAO
INCOME TAX TRIB UNAL APPBAL No.4.]0 of 2010
JUDCMENTT r1,,r tt,rt t,teSri Jyrricr.ts,rar A,,r/r.r
Ms. Sagarika Koneru, learned counsel, represent in . NIr. y. Ratnakar,learned counsel lor the appellant.
Ms' Bokaro S,pna Rcddy, Iearrccl Senior Standiur. |ourscl lor Income I{I'ax l)epartrrent appcarine on bchallol'rhc rcspondent.{I'ax l)epartrrent appcarine on bchallol'rhc rcspondent.
2. Ms. Sagarika Koneru, learned counsel, repres€ntir* Mr.. y. Ratnakar,
leamed counsel for the appellant, submits that despite all r:lrb,1s there has beenno response flom the appellant's side. She, therefore, l)r'a r's that the presentappeal may be disnrissed, with liberty gr.nted to the appcllrrnt to approach theCourt in case the cause of action still survivcs.
3. Recording thc atbresaid subrnissi.. made by lrr. learned counselappearing on behall'of the appellant, thc instant appea) .trrnds dismissed forwant of prosecution resen,ing the right ol'the appellant 1o .evive the same in
case il the appcllant is still aggrievcd o1- the irnpugned order [passed ]by [the]
lncome 1ax Appellate Tribunal. No costs
4. As a seque[, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- N. SRIHARIPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
ECTION OFFICER
To,
1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, B-Bench, Hyderabad.
2. One CC to Mr Y. RatnakarAdvocate 3. One CC to t\Is. Bokaro Sapna Reddy, Senior Standing Counsel lncome Tax3. One CC to t\Is. Bokaro Sapna Reddy, Senior Standing Counsel lncome Tax
Department
4. Two CD Copies
Kam/gh
HIGH COURT
DATED:0 610812025
JUDGMENTITTA.No.430 of 2010
DISMISSING OF THE APPEAL
6L0t?
(a):(I7: sEP 20fr\-, ^ li"_- -)//'
i
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.