Case LawHigh Court › Itta/430/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itta/430/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. M/S Hycons Infrastructure [India] Limited

High Court 17 Jul 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/430/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. M/S Hycons Infrastructure [India] Limited
Date of order
17 Jul 2014
Assessment year(s)
2007-2008
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/430/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. M/S Hycons Infrastructure [India] Limited, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: We are of the view that amendment or no amendment, if theprofit is estimated on any ground, whether ignoring books ofaccounts or rejection thereof, then there is no scope forallowability/disallowability of any deduction.

Decision: In the circumstances, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. No. 430 of 2014 DATED:17.07.2014 Between:The Commissioner of Income Tax-II,Hyderabad.And … Appellant M/s. Hycons Infrastructure (India) Ltd.,Hyderabad. ….Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA ANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. No. 430 of 2014 Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) This appeal is sought to be preferred against the judgmentand order of the learned Tribunal dated 23.10.2013 in relation tothe assessment year 2007-2008 on the following suggestedquestion of law: 1. In the facts and circumstances of the case,whether the Hon’ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal iscorrect in law in holding that once the income of theRespondent-assessee was estimated by rejecting thebooks of account, the Assessing Officer cannot makeany disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 when the labour payments asclaimed by the Respondent-assessee are liable to bedisallowed and to be added in terms of Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ? It appears from the records that there has been noproduction of books of accounts. Naturally, all the authoritiesbelow estimated profit at 8%. Mr.B. Narasimha Sarma, learned counsel for the appellantsubmits that even then, the provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) will have to beconsidered as it was amended subsequently. We are of the view that amendment or no amendment, if theprofit is estimated on any ground, whether ignoring books ofaccounts or rejection thereof, then there is no scope forallowability/disallowability of any deduction. In our consideredview, the above provision mentions how to consider the samewhen the books of accounts are available and the same shall beaccepted on fact by the authorities below. In the circumstances, the appeal is dismissed. Consequently, the miscellaneous applications, if anypending, shall also stand closed. No costs. __________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ _________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 17[th] July, 2014 pnb
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan