Itta/43/2016 Of The Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. M/S. Conexant Systems India Pvt.ltd., Hyd
High Court
13 Jun 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/43/2016 Of The Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. M/S. Conexant Systems India Pvt.ltd., Hyd
Date of order
13 Jun 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/43/2016 Of The Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. M/S. Conexant Systems India Pvt.ltd., Hyd, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
IUONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JUNETWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYANANDTHE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 43 OF 2016
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act,1961 against the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ['B']Hyderabad in lTA.No.712lHydl2o14 for assessment [year ]2003-04 daled 12.11.2014preferred against the order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals) llHyderabad, lTA.No.0273 to 0276/ClT (A)-ll, Hyd/2012-13 dated 17.01.2014,preferred against the order of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle 4,PAN/GlR No.AABCC34SSA dated 27 .O2.2006.
Between:
The Pr. Commissioner of lncome Tax-l, Hyderabad.
...APPELLANT
AND
M/s. Conexant Systems lndia Pvt. Ltd., D-3, Mariner Block, Vanenburg lTPark, Madhapur, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI B. NARASIMHA SARMA [(SC ][FOR l.T. ][DEPT)]Counsel forthe Respondent: SRI CH. PUSHYAM KIRAN
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE ION'BLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHL'}I,\IANDTHE H( N'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
|TTA.NO.43 0F 2016
(
Heard [t/r. B Narasimha Sarma learned Standing Counsel for lncomeTax Department for the appellant and Mr. Ch.Pushyanr Kirarr lr:arned counselfor the respondent.
Mr. B.Naras'nha Sarma, learned Standing Counse submits on thebasis of written in: tructions dated 07.06.2022 that the aptx-.al filed by theRevenue is require, I to be withdrawn as the issue is covere,l under Vivad SeVishwas' scheme.
That being tl e position, the related appeal is dismisse: on withdrawal
lnterlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand [,:losed. ]No orderas to costs
SD/. tVI.]S ANTHI VARDHANIiolNTREqIS.TRAR\\ -{ t '-'lL ['{\t\)-r-]!iECTION OFFICER
,TRUE COPY//
To,1. The Chairman, I lcome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderaba,i Bench 'B'Hyderabad.
2. The Commissior er of lncome Tax (Appeals)-ll, Hyderabai.
3. One CC to Sri B Narasimha Sarma, (SC for l.T. Dept) [Or:L,C]
4. One CC to Sri C t. Pushyam Kiran, Advocate
5. Two CD Copies
6. One Spare Cop'gbr
\.}/-
HIGH COURT
DATED: 13106,2022
ORDERITTA.No.43 ol'2016
DISMISSING I HE ITTAAS WITHDRA\ VNWITHOUT COIiTS@
.__ s.rArEI.,/i/'."7.lt [::]r T [N0'i ][2$Il]-\c\ir+\i.:),,g{[(t]'---i-fi:i{
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.