Itta/434/2010 Of Smt.g.prameela Devi v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
18 Mar 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/434/2010 Of Smt.g.prameela Devi v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
18 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
2005-2006
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/434/2010 Of Smt.g.prameela Devi v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: No.434 OF 2010 JUDGMENT:[(Per ]Sri [.)u.stice ][l\,l.S.lluntlchLnLlru ][Ruo)] A memo has been filed by the counsel lor [the ][appellant ][stating]that the appellant wishes to [witl-rdraw ][this ][appeal ][in ][view ][of ][an ][order]dated 05.03.2021 in Forn.r-3 [passed ][by ][tl.re ][Designated ][Au...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF TUARCHTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTIGE T.VINOD KUMAR
|.T.T.A. NO: 434F 2010
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260 of the lncome [Tax Act, ][against]the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ['A' ][Hyderabad in ] No.69/Hyd/2010 for Assessment Year 2005-2006 dated [30104110 ][13/5/10 ][preferred]against the order of the Commissioner of lncome [Tax (Appeals)-lV, ][Hyderabad Appeal]No.369/lTO-6(3yClT(A)-lV/08-09 dated 30/10i2009 [preferred against ][the ][Order ][of ][the]lncome Tax Officer, Ward-6(3) PAN/GlR [No.AHXPG ][7434J1P1484 ][dated ][26112108']
Between:
G.Prameela Devi,
..,APPELLANT
AND
lncome Tax Officer, Ward-6 [3], [6rh ]Floor, [lT ][Towers, AC Guards, ][Hyderabad]
..,RESPONDENT
For the Appellant : SRI K.VASANTH [KUMAR, ][Advocate]For the Respondent : SRI B.NARASIMHA [SARMA, ][Advocate]
The Couft made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE [M.S.RAMACHANDRA ] ANI)
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE T.VINOD KUMAR
I.T.T.A. No.434 OF 2010
JUDGMENT:[(Per ]Sri [.)u.stice ][l\,l.S.lluntlchLnLlru ][Ruo)]
A memo has been filed by the counsel lor [the ][appellant ][stating]that the appellant wishes to [witl-rdraw ][this ][appeal ][in ][view ][of ][an ][order]dated 05.03.2021 in Forn.r-3 [passed ][by ][tl.re ][Designated ][Authority ][under]the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, [2020.]
2. ln that view of the matter, this appeal is dismissed [as ][withdrawn]with liberly to approach this Court if there is no settlement [under ][the said]Act. No costs
3. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also standdismissed.
Sd/-K.SREENIVASA RAOJOrNT REGTSIIRAR//TRUE COPY//[,\./SECTION OFFICER
To1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad [A Bench, ][Hyderabad]2l One CC to Sri K.Vasanth Kumar, Advocate [(OPUC)]3. One CC to Sri B.Narasimha Sarma, [Advocate (OPUC)]4. Two CD CopiesKj.7
,%lo{
HIGH COURTDATED:18/03/2021
ORDER
lTTA.No.434 of 2010
DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN THE ITTA.
"A-::::riHE [4 ]re-e.(o)()1 2 [APn ][2021]-/,.Y**O=i Dr.t
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.