Itta/436/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. M/S Unicorn Industries Private Limited
High Court
21 Sep 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/436/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. M/S Unicorn Industries Private Limited
Date of order
21 Sep 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/436/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. M/S Unicorn Industries Private Limited, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed. _____________________ K.J.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH ATHYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAAND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
I.T.T.A. Nos. 436 and 437 of 2013
DATE: 21.09.2013
I.T.T.A. No.436 of 2013Between:
Commissioner of Income Tax-III,Hyderabad.
… Appellant
And
M/s. Unicorn Industries Private Limited,Secunderabad.
… Respondent
This Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
I.T.T.A. Nos. 436 and 437 of 2013
COMMON JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
After hearing Sri B. Narasimha Sarma, learned counsel for theappellant and going through the impugned judgment and order of the learnedTribunal, we are of the view that in these matters no point of law is involved,as the matters have been remanded for fresh adjudication.
Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed.
_____________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
________________
K. C. BHANU, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue