In Itta/436/2015 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Late B.kistamma, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANAndTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
I.T.T.A.M.P.No.2 of 2016IN/AND
I.T.T.A.No.436 of 2015
COMMON ORDER:(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan)
I.T.T.A.M.P.No.2 of 2016 is filed seeking permission to withdrawI.T.T.A.No.436 of 2015 as not pressed in terms of circular No.21/2015dated 10.12.2015 issued to the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
Permission is accorded and I.T.T.A.No.436 of 2015 is dismissed aswithdrawn. I.T.T.A.M.P.No.2 of 2016 is disposed of accordingly.Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand disposed of. Thereshall be no order as to costs.
______________________________
RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J
06[th] January, 2016.Tsy
__________________________________
M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue