Case LawHigh Court › Itta/439/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itta/439/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Hyderabad v. M/S Andhra Bank, Hyderabad

High Court 08 Nov 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/439/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Hyderabad v. M/S Andhra Bank, Hyderabad
Date of order
08 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/439/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Hyderabad v. M/S Andhra Bank, Hyderabad, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: As this Court has already dismissed I.T.T.A.No.555 of 2014, confirming the order in I.T.A.No.95/Hyd/2010, this Appeal is also dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY & HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A.No.439 of 2014 Date : 08-11-2017 Between : The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Hyderabad .. Appellant And M/s. Andhra Bank, Head Office Dr. Pattabhi Bhavan, Saifabad, Hyderabad .. Respondent Counsel for appellant : Sri K. Raji Reddy, Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department Counsel for respondent : Dr. C.P. Ramaswami, Standing Counsel For Andhra Bank The Court made the following : ORDER:(per Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy) Common order dated 04-10-2013 to the extent it pertains to I.T.A.No.1943/Hyd/2011 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench “A”, Hyderabad, is the subject matter of this Appeal. Mr. K. Raji Reddy, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department, fairly placed before us a copy of the order dated 08-08-2014 in I.T.T.A.No.555 of 2014 arising out of the order dated 04-04-2013 in I.T.A.No.95/Hyd/2010 pertaining to the respondent-assessee itself. By the said order, a Division Bench of this Court has dismissed the said I.T.T.A. confirming the order of the Tribunal, the operation portion of which reads as under : “It appears that the learned Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer wanted to reopen the assessment on the basis of mere change of opinion. It is legally well settled that mere change in the opinion does not enable the Assessing Officer to reopen any assessment beyond four years. For that matter, the CBDT circular cannot take place of the law.” We therefore, do not find any relevance of the CBDT circular, as quoted in the suggested question of law, to the present case.” A perusal of the order under Appeal shows that the Tribunal has referred to and relied upon the order dated 04-04-2013 in I.T.A.No.95/Hyd/2010. As this Court has already dismissed I.T.T.A.No.555 of 2014, confirming the order in I.T.A.No.95/Hyd/2010, this Appeal is also dismissed. No costs. _______________________Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy Date : 08-11-2017 ______________________ Justice Challa Kodanda Ram AM
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan