Case LawHigh Court › Itta/439/2016 Of Sri Gavva Amarender Red...

Itta/439/2016 Of Sri Gavva Amarender Reddy v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 17 Mar 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/439/2016 Of Sri Gavva Amarender Reddy v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
17 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
2010-11
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/439/2016 Of Sri Gavva Amarender Reddy v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF IVARCHTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T,VINOD KUMAR LT.T.A. NO: 439 OF 2016 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, againstthe order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A' Hyderabad in ITAthe order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A' Hyderabad in ITANo.899/Hyd/2015 for Assessment Year 2010-11, dated 1710212016 preferred againstthe Order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-Xl, Hyderabad in AppealNo.0312 to 314 & 317lCC-s Hyd/ClT(A)-l 13-14114-15 dated 24104120'15 preferredagainst the Order of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Central Circle-l(3) inPAN/GlR No.ACAPG1085F dated 1 5-6-201 5.against the Order of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Central Circle-l(3) inPAN/GlR No.ACAPG1085F dated 1 5-6-201 5. Between: Gawa Amarender Reddy, AND The Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle 2(3), Hyderabad For the Appellant : SRI CH.PUSHYAM KIRAN, AdvocateFor the Respondent : NONE APPEARED ...APPELLANT ...RESPONDENT The Court made the following: ORDER ! TH E TIONOTIRA BLE SRI .IL STICE }{.S. R-A,},IACI I,\N DRA R,AO.\_\t).\_\t) TllE HO)-OUIIABLE SRt JL SI-ICI 1.. \'t\OI) Kt ]1.\R I.'1..'l'..\.\o.J-l9 ol 2{) I (r J L:DG}I ENT : (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice M.S. Raniachi ndra Rao) Learned counsel for appellant seeks to withdrau. this Appeal toapproach the respondents under the Direct Taxes (Vivad Se Vishwas)Act,2020.approach the respondents under the Direct Taxes (Vivad Se Vishwas)Act,2020. Having regard to the said submission, this appeal is dismissedas withdrawn, with liberty to approach this Court in the event there isno resolution o1'the dispute of thc petirioner with the l)epartmentLrncler the sai<i Act. No costs. As a scqLrcl. uriscelltrneous pctitions pcndine. il..tn1,, shall standc lo seci .I]d/-B.S.CHIRANJEEVIJOINT REGISTRAR,TRUE COPY'QtSECTION OFFICER To 1 The lnc^ome_Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench-A, liyderabad2. One CC to Sri Ch.Pushyam Kiran, Advocate (OpUC)3. Two CD Copiesv L dESA(q'too()SAPRoilJUDGMENT*7ITTA.No.439 of 2016..7 ITTA DISMISSED AS WITHDRAW N NO COSTS.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan