Itta/44/2009 Of Shri Prabhudayal Agarwal v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-10 [1], Hyderabad

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD THURSDAY ,THE TWENry EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHEANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO| 4r'-0F 2009 Income tax Tribunar Appear under section 260-4 of the rncome tax Act, 1961,against the order of the rncome Tax Appelate Tribunar, B-Bench, Hyderabad in rrANo 563 of 2003 in Misc. Apprn. No. 22 r Hydt 2009 dated z4-04-2oog forAssessment Year 1g8g-g0 preferred against the order of the commissioner oflncome Tax (Appeals), Guntur:: CAMp at Hyderabad dated 30-12_2002 in AppealNos. 0059ffr/crr(A) cNT/2002-003 , 0058/Tr./crr (A)GNT/2002-03, ooilTtrr.tctr(A). c NT t2002-03, 0055/Tr./C tT(A) c N T/2002_03 .Between:Shri Prabhudayal Agarwal, Secunderabad. ...APPELLANT ...APPELLANT AND The lncome tax Officer, Ward -10 (1), Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT counsel for the Appeflant: SRr. y. Koteswara Rao, representing sri y. RatnakarCounsel for the Respondent: SRI B. Narasimha SarmaThe Court delivered the following Judgment : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.44 of 2OO9 JUDGMENT: per the Hon'bte the Chief Justice Alok Arad.he) Mr. Y.Koteswara Rao learned counsel representing Mr. Y.Ratnakar, learned counsel for the appellalt. 2. 2. learned counsel for the appellant submits that theissue involved in this appeal does not survive for considerationon account of efflux of time. JThe aforesaid submission is taken on record 4. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, sha_ll standclosed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- M. VIJAYA BHASRJOINT REGISRSECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To 1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, B-Bench, Hyderabad 2. The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals), Guntur:: CAMp at Hyderabad 3. One CC to SRl. Y. RATNAKAR, Advocate tOpUCI 4. One CC to SRI B. NARASTMHA SARMA, Advocate IOPUCI 5. Two CD Copies kul/gha \ HIGH COURT DATED:2811112024 JUDGMENTITTA.No.44 of 2009 DISMISSING THE IT'IA AS INFRUCTUOUS T [ $14 FtoJJs(i,?0n7\r-oi, [.z]\,'i