Case LawHigh Court › Itta/44/2014 Of D.s. Karunakar Reddy, Hy...

Itta/44/2014 Of D.s. Karunakar Reddy, Hyd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hyd

High Court 17 Dec 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/44/2014 Of D.s. Karunakar Reddy, Hyd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hyd
Date of order
17 Dec 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itta/44/2014 Of D.s. Karunakar Reddy, Hyd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hyd, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

rN rHE [H|GH ][.ou*If3|o',J*=ot"t#E ][oF ] THURSDAY ' ,THE [SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER]N,VOIHOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE [M'S'RAMACHANDRA ] ANDTHE HONOURABLE [SRIJiJ.TICE ][T.AMARNATH ] lNcoMET [ NO:][ 44 ][0F][ 2][014] (lncorne Tax [Tribunal ][Appeal under ][Section 260 ] [ofthe ][Income ][Tax ][Act ][1961' ][agatnst]Hyderabad [in]the order [of ][the ][Income ][Tax Appellate ][Tribunal' ][Hyderabad Bench ][' ] " ITANo..T56lHYDl2oltlorAssessmentYear2006-07dated30-11-201lprefenedagainst the [Order ][of ][the ][Cornmissioner ][of ][Income ][Tax ][( ][Appeals ][) ][- ][I' ][Hyderabad' ][in]ITA No. [OgTglCC-6, ] [( ][A) ][- ] [/ ][09-10 dated ][23-02-2011 ][preferred ][against the]Order of the [Deputy ][Commissioner ][of ][Income ][Tax' ][Central ][Circle ][- ][6 ][' ][Hyderabad']PAN/GIR [No.AHCPC ][0573 ] [dated 3l-12-2009 ][)] Between:Sri Lakshmi [Nilayam ][Apartments' ][Rajeev]D.S. KARUNAKAR [REDDY, ][Flat ][No ][302']Nagar, HYderabad. ,..APPELLANT ANDDeputy Commissioner [of lncome ][Tax' ][Central ][Circle ][- ][6' ][Hyderabad'] ...RESPONDENT Counsel [for the Appellant: ] [A' ][V' ] Counsel [for the Respondent: ]"'''#au6ir'iii [B' ] ibUrlsrr- ron lNcoME rAx The Court [delivered the ][following: ][Judgment] To THE HONOURABLE [M'S'RAMACHANDRA ] ANT) THE HONOURABLE [T' AMARNATH ] t.T.To.44 of[20t4] JUDGMENT [: ][(Per ][Hon'ble ][Sri ][Justice ][M'S' ][Ramachandra Rao)] Learned [counsel ][for ][appellant ][seeks ][to ][withdraw this ][Appeal to]initiate [proceedings under ][the ][Sabka ][Vishwas ][Scheme ][declared ][by ][the]Government [of lndia'] Granting [liberty to ][revive the Appeal in the ][event ][the ][appeilant]does not [get ][satisfactory resuh ][in ][the ][said ][Scheme' ][this ][appeal ][is]clismissed [as ][withdrawn' ][No ][costs'] As a sequel, [miscellaneous ][petitions pending' ][il ][any' shall ][stand]Iclosed. sD/-K [G6rt?t?HsrElR]$e"' //TRUE SECTION 1. The [Incorne ][Tax Appellate ][Tribunal' ][Hyderabad Bench ]t - I' [Hvderabad'][' ] ['' ][Hyderabad]The [[Commissioner ][ot ]][[ot ]] 2. The [[Commissioner ][ot ]][[ot ]]'"t"'"t'it-l'e'pltatt '"t"'"t'it-l'e'pltatt t,tr#,ffi{i#!#:w#tl#:qr[qi]-;i;lli'"Tl HIGH COURT MSRJ & TAJDATED:1711212020 ORDER|TTA.No.4A of 20'14 DISMISSING THE ITTA AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS sN- t--1 n4 -\'' ,)? [aa\or ]\-' 1Hes14(<Jco2 3 JAl| ?U21:.f:
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan