Itta/445/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. Mr. V. Somashekar
High Court
28 Dec 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/445/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. Mr. V. Somashekar
Date of order
28 Dec 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/445/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. Mr. V. Somashekar, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: As the appeal preferred against theorder passed by the Tribunal in I.T.A.No.669/Hyd/2008 has beendismissed by this Court, this appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
I.T.T.A. No.445 of 2015
JUDGMENT :(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan)
This appeal, under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961is preferred against the order dated 30.09.2009 inI.T.A.No.668/Hyd/2008, passed by the Income Tax AppellateTribunal, Hyderabad.
2 . The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad passed acommon order dated 30.09.2009 in I.T.A.Nos.668/Hyd/2008 and669/Hyd/2008. Against the order passed by the Tribunal inI.T.A.No.669/Hyd/2008, the Revenue preferred I.T.T.A.No.240 of2014, which was dismissed by a Division Bench of this Court by itsjudgment dated 02.04.2014. As the appeal preferred against theorder passed by the Tribunal in I.T.A.No.669/Hyd/2008 has beendismissed by this Court, this appeal also stands dismissed.
3. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shallstand closed. No order as to costs.
_________________________________
JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
______________________________________
JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
28.12.2015.
Msr
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
I.T.T.A. No.445 of 2015
28.12.2015
Msr
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue