Itta/445/2018 Of Smt. Atluri Parvathi Devi v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
29 Apr 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/445/2018 Of Smt. Atluri Parvathi Devi v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
29 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/445/2018 Of Smt. Atluri Parvathi Devi v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF APRILTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S,RAMACHANDRA ANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 445 OF [2018]
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section [260 of ][the ][lncome ][Tax Act, ][against]the order of the lncome Tax Appellate [Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench "A", ] [bench,]Hyderabad in lTA.No.1544/Hyderabad/20'16, [for ][assessment ][Year ][2009-2010,]daled 20.12.2017 [preferred ]against [the ][Order ][of the ][Commissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax](Appeals)-s Hyderabad, Appeal No.69 of 20'15-16 dated 27.03.2015, [preferred against]the order of the Assistant commissioner [of ][lncome ][Tax ][circle-ll (1) ][PAN/GlR.No.]AFWPA 9793 dated 09.03.2015.
Between:
Smt. Afluri Parvathi Devi, Flat [No.105, ][Narayanadri Block, ][Seven ][Hills Apartments,]Nizampet Road, Kukatpally, Hyderabad.
...APPELLANT
AND
The Assistant Commissioner of [lncome Tax, Circle ][- ][1 ][1(1 ]), [Hyderabad.]
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant: [SRl. ] Counsel for the Respondent: [SRl. ][B. ][NARASIMHA SHARMA, SC FOR ][l'T']The Court delivered the [following: ]
HONOURABLE SRI [M.S.RAMACHANDRA ]
AND
HONOURABLE SRI [JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR]
ITTA.No.445 of2018
JUDGMENT:
(.oer Sri Justice M.S.Ramachandra Rao)
Counsel for the appellant has [filed ][a ][Memo]dt.26.O4.2O2 1 seeking [permission ][to ][withdraw ][the ][Appeal]on the ground that the Designated [Authority ][has ][passed]order dt.07.O1.2021 in [Form-3 ][under ][Vivaad ][Se ][Vishwas]Acl,2O2O.
2. In view of the same, the [Appeal ][is ][dismissed ][as]withdrawn with liberty to seek restoration [of the ][appeal]in the event there is no satisfactory [resolution ][under ][the]said Act. No order as to costs.
3. Consequently, miscellaneous [petitions ][pending, ][if]any, shall stand closed.
sar x sruMVf;ffi /N-'''
,TRUE
SECTION
To,
1. The [lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal ]['A' ] [Bench' ][Hyderabad]
2. One One [to ][Sri ] [Vasantkumar' Advocate
2. One One 3. One [to ][Sri ] [Narasimha Sharma' ] [for ] [
4. Two CD [CoPies]
gbr \.>z
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2910412021
JUDGMENTITTA.No.44S of [2018]
DISMISSING THE ITTAAS WITHDRI\WN",>b
IffiNq'5cn'}l'v,J1,ltJ21,..t'..-i
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.