Itta/449/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iv v. M/S. Mekins Agro Product (P) Ltd
High Court
25 Sep 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/449/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iv v. M/S. Mekins Agro Product (P) Ltd
Date of order
25 Sep 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/449/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iv v. M/S. Mekins Agro Product (P) Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed. _____________________ K.J.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH ATHYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAAND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
I.T.T.A. No. 449 of 2013
DATE: 25.09.2013
Between:
The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV,Hyderabad.
… Appellant
And
M/s. Mekins Agro Product Private Ltd.,Hyderabad.
… Respondent
This Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
I.T.T.A. No. 449 of 2013
JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
We have heard Sri J.V. Prasad, learned counsel for the appellant andgone through the impugned judgment and order of the learned Tribunal.
It appears that the learned Tribunal has followed the decision of thecoordinate bench of the Hyderabad Tribunal in the case of Potla NageswaraRao in ITA.No.1519/Hyd/2011, dated 22.03.2012.
It is submitted by Sri Prasad that the department has preferred anappeal against the aforesaid order on which the learned Tribunal has placedreliance.
However, it is not stated in the grounds of appeal that an appeal hasbeen preferred. On the basis of oral submission and without having anymaterial, we are not inclined to accept the submission made by the learnedcounsel for the appellant.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
_____________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
________________
K. C. BHANU, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.