Case LawHigh Court › Itta/449/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itta/449/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iv v. M/S. Mekins Agro Product (P) Ltd

High Court 25 Sep 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/449/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iv v. M/S. Mekins Agro Product (P) Ltd
Date of order
25 Sep 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/449/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iv v. M/S. Mekins Agro Product (P) Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed. _____________________ K.J.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH ATHYDERABAD THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAAND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU I.T.T.A. No. 449 of 2013 DATE: 25.09.2013 Between: The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV,Hyderabad. … Appellant And M/s. Mekins Agro Product Private Ltd.,Hyderabad. … Respondent This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU I.T.T.A. No. 449 of 2013 JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) We have heard Sri J.V. Prasad, learned counsel for the appellant andgone through the impugned judgment and order of the learned Tribunal. It appears that the learned Tribunal has followed the decision of thecoordinate bench of the Hyderabad Tribunal in the case of Potla NageswaraRao in ITA.No.1519/Hyd/2011, dated 22.03.2012. It is submitted by Sri Prasad that the department has preferred anappeal against the aforesaid order on which the learned Tribunal has placedreliance. However, it is not stated in the grounds of appeal that an appeal hasbeen preferred. On the basis of oral submission and without having anymaterial, we are not inclined to accept the submission made by the learnedcounsel for the appellant. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. _____________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ ________________ K. C. BHANU, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan