Itta/45/2009 Of Shri Prabhudayal Agarwal v. The Incometax Officer, Ward-10 [1], Hyderabad

IN THE HIGH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY ,THE TWO THOUSAND PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE ANDTHE HON'BLE SRI [J. ] INCOME TAX [ NO:45 ] [2009] lncometaxTribunalAppealunderSection260-4ofthelncometaxAct,l96l'againsttheorderofthelncomeTaxAppellateTribunal,B-BENCH'HyderabadinMisc.Appln'No'23of2009inlTANo.564/Hydi2003dated24-04-2009fortheassessmentyearlgg0-91preferredagainsttheorderoftheCommissioneroflncome Tax [(Appeals), Guntur ][CAMP at ][Hyderabad dated ][3O-12-2002 ][in ][Appeal]Nos 0059/Tr./ClT [(A) ][GNT/2002-O3, ][OOSStTr'tClT ][(A) ] '0057ffr' [lCtT](A/GNT t2o)2-03, 0055iTr.iClT(A) [GNT/2002-03'] Between: Shri Prabhudayal [Aganrval' ][Secunderabad ] ...A''ELLANT AND The lncometax Officer, [Ward -10 (1), ][Hyderabad ] "'RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: [SRl. Y. KOTESWARA ][RAO, ] SRI Y. RATNAKAR Counsel for the [Respondent: ] The Court delivered [the ][following ] [:] THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE I{oN'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENTVAS RAO INCOlvtlt TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.45 of 2OO9 JUDGMENT: (i>er the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Alok Aradhe) Mr. Y.l( rteswara Rao, iearned counsel representing Mr. Y.Ratnakiu', learned counsel for the appellant. 2. Lea:ned counsel for the appellant submits that theissue involvec in this appeal does not survive for considerationon account of e fflr.x of time. 3. The aforesaid submission is taken on record. 4. A6,:ordingly, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellan :ous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Howevr.r, there shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- K. SRINIVASA JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The lncome [-t:rx ][Appellate ][Tribunal, ] [BENCH, ][Hyderabad] 2. The Commi:;sioner [of lncome ][Tax ][(Appeals), ][Guntur ][CAMP at Hyderabad] 3. THE INCOM=IAX [OFFICER, WARD-10 ][1], [HYDERABAD'] 4. One CC to [S;Fll. ][Y. RATNAKAR, Advocate ][OPUCI 5. Two CD Copie [s] kut/gh HIGH COURT DATED:2811112024 ,/ --'a::=::[-- ]):'r.i l''.)(.:.ORDER1 1 D[:I ir24lTTA.No.45 of 200!)a DTSMISSING THE I'T fA AS INFRUCTUOTJS W