Itta/45/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax I v. M/S. B.a. Continuum India Pvt Ltd
High Court
23 Jul 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/45/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax I v. M/S. B.a. Continuum India Pvt Ltd
Date of order
23 Jul 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/45/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax I v. M/S. B.a. Continuum India Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Therefore, this appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO.45 OF 2013
DATED:23.7.2013
Between:
The Commissioner of Income Tax-IHyderabad … Appellant
And
M/s. B.A. Continuum India Pvt. Ltd.,Building No.5, Mind SpaceRaheja IT Park, Hitech CityMadhapurHyderabad … Respondent
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
I.T.T.A. NO.45 OF 2013
JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant and havingperused the impugned judgment and order of the learned Tribunal, weare of the view that the Tribunal did not commit any mistake either onfact or in law, as it had followed series of judgments of the High Courtsas well as the Tribunals. Moreover, the issue is also covered by theorder of the Tribunal dt.28.7.2011 in assessee’s own case in ITANo.1065/Hyd/2011.
Therefore, this appeal is dismissed. There will be no order as tocosts.
________________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
______________________
K.C. BHANU, J
23.7.2013
bnr
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.