Case LawHigh Court › Itta/45/2020 Of Smt. Atluri Usha Rani v....

Itta/45/2020 Of Smt. Atluri Usha Rani v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 22 Apr 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/45/2020 Of Smt. Atluri Usha Rani v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
22 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/45/2020 Of Smt. Atluri Usha Rani v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE [M.S.RAMACHANDRA ] ANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE [T.VINOD KUMAR] r.T.T.NO: 45 OF 2 lncome Tax Tribunal [Appeal under ][section ][260-A of ][the ][lncome Tax Act, against]the order of the lncome [Tax Appellate ][Tribunal, ][Hyderabad Bench ]['A', ][Hyderabad in ] No. 1 379/Hyd/20'1 6 for assessment [year 2009-2010 dated ][201121201 ][7 ][preferred against]the order of the [commissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax ][Appeals-5 ][Hyderabad ][Appeal]No.0075/2015-16/ClT [(A)-5 ][daled ][29107t2016 ][preferred against ][the ][order ][of ][the]Assistant commissioner [of ][lncome ][Tax, ][Circle-l(1) PAN/GIR ][No.AGGPA2',l336 dated]91312015" Between:Smt. Atluri Usha [Rani, ][H. ][No.l ][101, ][Sri ][Raghava ][Towers, Hyder ][Nagar, ][Kukatpally,]HYderabad' ...APPELLANT AND Assistant Commissioner [of lncome Tax, Circle ][- ][1(1), ][Hyderabad'] ...RESPONDENT For the Appellant [: SRI ][K.VASANTH ][KUMAR, ][Advocate] For the Respondent [:] The Court made the [following: ORDER] HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOAND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR ITTA.No.4S of 2O2O JUDGMENT: per Sn Justice M.S.Rannchanctra Rao) Counsei for the appeilant has filed a Memod1.26.O2.2O2 1 seeking to withdraw the appeal on theground that the Designated Authority has passed orderdt. 10.02.202 1 in Form 3 under Vivaad Se Vishwas Act,2O2O, and also seeks liberty to approach the Court if thesituation so warrants. 2. Granting libertyASsought for, this Appeal1Sdismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. 3. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, ifany, shall stand closed. Sd/-K,SREENIVASA RAOJOINT REGISTRARQrySECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPYII To 1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Hyderabad. 2. One CC to Sri K.Vasanth Kumar, Advocate (OPUC) 3. Two CD CopiesKj.Kj. fi_- \ HIGH COURT DATED:2210412021 ORDER ITTA.No.45 of 2020 DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN THE ITTA. 1rr[g ] [IAI4i]E{:5:: lltt-)O01 [iJit ][2021]r. )l,{//**://
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan