Itta/452/2016 Of N. Gangadhara Bose, Vijayawada v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vijayawada
High Court
12 Nov 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Itta/452/2016 Of N. Gangadhara Bose, Vijayawada v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vijayawada
Date of order
12 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
2008-09
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/452/2016 Of N. Gangadhara Bose, Vijayawada v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vijayawada, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOURPRESENT
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDARAND
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 452 OF 2016
Appeal under Section 260 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 praying thatthe High Court may be pleased to allow the appeal by duly setting asidetheOrderdated27-05-2016passedinI.T.ANo.256A/izag/2015(Assessmentyear2008-09)bytheIncomeTaxAppellateTribunal,Visakhapatnam Bench, Visakhapatnam, filed challenging[the][ Order][ dated]05-02-2013passedinPAN/GIRNo.ABHPN8149B/A.Y.2008-09,bytheCommissioner of Income Tax, Vijayawada.
Between:
N.GangadharaBoses,S/o.N.MadhusudanaRao,D.No.27-38-61,M.G.Road, Vijayawada-520 010.
...Appellant
AND
Commissioner of Income Tax, Vijayawada.
...Respondent
Counsel for the Appellant:Smt Punnayavathi Reddipalli, representingSri G.V.N.Hari
k
Counsel for the Respondent :Sri Y.N.Vivekananda (Standing Counselfor Income Tax Department)
5The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
a
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDARANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
I.T.T.A.No.452 OF 2016
JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice G.Narendar)
1.HeardSmt.PunnayavathiReddipalli,learnedcounselappearing onbehalf of Sri G.V.N.Hari,learned counselfortheappellant and Sri Y.N.Vivekananda, learned Standing[Counsel][ for]the Respondent-Income Tax Department.appearing onbehalf of Sri G.V.N.Hari,learned counselfortheappellant and Sri Y.N.Vivekananda, learned Standing[Counsel][ for]the Respondent-Income Tax Department.
2.Learnedcounselfor the appellant hasfiled apetitionforwithdrawal of the appeal. The relevant portion of the petition readsas under:withdrawal of the appeal. The relevant portion of the petition readsas under:
6.Thus,the grievanceof theappellant stoodredressed on account relief granted bythe learnedCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and as suchpresent appeal beforetheHon’bleHighCourt hasbecome infructuous. ”
3.Submission is placed on record and the Appeal is dismissed
as having been rendered infructuous. There shall be[no][ order][ as][ to]costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending,if any, shall
stand closed.
E.KAMESWARA RAO
JOINT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECIldN^felCER
To,
1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam[Bench,][ at]Visakhapatnam.Visakhapatnam.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Vijayawada.
3. One CC to Sri G.V.N.Hari, Advocate
4. One CC to Sri Y.N.Vivekananda, Advocate
5. Three CD Copies
BSV
ns
HIGH COURT
BSV
DATED:12/11/2024
JUDGMENT
oVx0 6 MAR 2C:3. Curront Section. ^
ITTA.No.452 of 2016
DISMISSING THE ITTA AS INFRUCTUOUSWITHOUT COSTS
r
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.