Itta/453/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. M/S. Rasa Agrotech Private Ltd
High Court
18 Feb 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/453/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. M/S. Rasa Agrotech Private Ltd
Date of order
18 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/453/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. M/S. Rasa Agrotech Private Ltd, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 5Therefore, the appeal [filed ][by ][the Department ][is ][dismissed in]terms of the aforesaid [Circular ][No.9 ][of ][2024 ][dated 17'09'2024']However, if the [appeal comes ][within the ][exception ][of ][Circular]No.5 of 2024, it would [be open ][to ][the Income ][Tax ][Department ][to]seek reviva...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR AT HYDERABADTUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM ANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL [NO: 453 OF ][2012]
Appeal filed under Section 260(4) of the [lncome-Tax ][Act ]' [1961, against ][the]order dated 18.02.2011 [passed ]in [lTA.No. ][1277lHydl2l1o ][for the ][assessment ][year]2OO7 -OB on the file of the lncome Tax [Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad Bench ]['B']Hyderabad preferred against the Order [dated ][26.07.2010 ][passed ][in ]flppeal [No]219tAcff -3(1)tClT(A)-lV/2009-10 on the [file of the ][Commissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax](Appeals)-lV, Hyderabad preferred against the Assessment Order [dated 24.12-2009]passed in PAN/GIR No. on the file of the Deputy [Commissioner ][of]lncome Tax, Circle 3(1), Hyderabad.
Between:
Commissioner of lncome Tax-lll, [lT Towers, A.C. Guards, ][Hyderabad]
...Appellant
AND
M/s. Rasa Agrotech Private LTD., Unicorn [House ][No. ][3, ][Nr. ][Gunrock Diamond]Point, Transport Road, Secunderabad [- 500 ][009]
...Respondent
Counsel for the Appellant: Ms. B. Sapna Reddy Standing [Gounsel]representing Mr. J.V. Prasad SeniorStanding Counsel for the Income [Tax]Department
Counsel for the Respondent : Sri [Ch Pushyam Kiran]
The Court made the following: ORDER
I,
THE TION0URABLE [P.SAM ] ANDTHE HONOTJRABLE [RA(f]NANDIKONDA
ITTA No.[4s30F ][2012]
JUDGMEN'[; [r][per ][Hon'ble ][Sri ][Justice ][P.Sam ][Koshy)]
Heard N[;. [B-Sapna ][Reddy, ][leamed ][Junior ][Standing]
Counsel [repres'r ][lting ][Mr. ][J'V'Prasad, leamed ][Senior ][Standing]Counsel for [r-he ][Income ][Tax ][Department ][for ][the appetlant' ][Perused]the record.
Thisr appeal [[under Section ]][[260A ][of ][the ][Income ]][[of ][the ][Income ]][[the ][Income ]][[Income ]][[Tax Act']]
2. Thisr appeal [[under Section ]][[260A ][of ][the ][Income ]][[of ][the ][Income ]][[the ][Income ]][[Income ]][[Tax Act']]1961, har; [bet:rt ][preferred ][by ][the ][Revenue ][as ][the ][appellant]the [orrl':r ][dated ][18.02'2011 ][passed ][by ][the ][Inconle ][Tax]against Appellate [Tri:una[, ][Hyderabad ][Bench ]['B" ][Hycterabad' ][in]I.T.A.No.1277 [for ][the ][Assessnient ][Year ][2007-08']3. Central 'loard [of ][Direct ][Taxes ][(CBDT) ][has ][issued ][(lircular]No.9 of 11024 [dated ][17.09.2024, ][amending ][the ][previous ][(lircular]No.5of20l]4rtated15.03.2024,byfurtherenhancingthemonetarylimits for filini; [appeals ][by ][the Income ][Tax ][Departmerrt ][belore ][the]Income Tax Appellate [Tribunals, ][High ][Courts and ][Supreme ][Court]
,
I
o
as a measure for reducing [litigation. ][In ][paragraph ][2 ][of ][the ][said]Circular, we find [that ][the monetary ][limit ][fixed ][for filing ][an ][appeal]before the High Court [is Rs.2.00 ][crore.]
4In the instant appeal, [tax effect ][is well ][below the ][monetary]limit.
5Therefore, the appeal [filed ][by ][the Department ][is ][dismissed in]terms of the aforesaid [Circular ][No.9 ][of ][2024 ][dated 17'09'2024']However, if the [appeal comes ][within the ][exception ][of ][Circular]No.5 of 2024, it would [be open ][to ][the Income ][Tax ][Department ][to]seek revival of the [appeal. ][There shall ][be ][no order ][as ][to costs']
6. Consequently, miscellaneous [petitions ][pending, ][if ][any, ][shall]
stand closed.
Sd/. K. SRINIVASA JOINT REGISTRAR//TRUE COPY//SECTION
\To,
1. The lncome [Tax ][Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad ][Bench'B' ][Hyderabad']
Z. fhe Commissionei [of lncome ][Tax ][(Appeals)-lV' ][H-yderabad']5. fn" O"prty [Commissioner ][of ][lncome Tax, Circle ][3(1)' ][Hyderabad.]io [Ms ][B. ][Sapna ][Reddv ][Standing ][Counsel ][for ][lncome]5. fn" O"prty [Commissioner ][of ][lncome Tax, Circle ][3(1)' ][Hyderabad.]io [Ms ][B. ][Sapna ][Reddv ][Standing ][Counsel ][for ][lncome];. o;;-C'C
Tax
6. Consequently, miscellaneous [petitions ][pending, ][if ][any, ][shall]
stand closed.
Sd/. K. SRINIVASA JOINT REGISTRAR//TRUE COPY//SECTION
\To,
1. The lncome [Tax ][Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad ][Bench'B' ][Hyderabad']
Z. fhe Commissionei [of lncome ][Tax ][(Appeals)-lV' ][H-yderabad']5. fn" O"prty [Commissioner ][of ][lncome Tax, Circle ][3(1)' ][Hyderabad.]io [Ms ][B. ][Sapna ][Reddv ][Standing ][Counsel ][for ][lncome]5. fn" O"prty [Commissioner ][of ][lncome Tax, Circle ][3(1)' ][Hyderabad.]io [Ms ][B. ][Sapna ][Reddv ][Standing ][Counsel ][for ][lncome];. o;;-C'C
Tax
5.ffi 3TffJLi?8 [h, ][El,L?;yf ][tira ][n, ][Advocate ][to ][p u ][cl]6.Two CD CoPies6.Two CD CoPiesDL/gh
:l
l
HIGH COURT
DATED:18/02120125
JUDGMENT
1TTA.No.453 of 2012
DISMISSING THE II-TAa[5]\
1HE9[=:-=^.]r,qri-(o+q-)+/204AP2Mi,/ofa\l/z.. -:-----'?
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.