Case LawHigh Court › Itta/453/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itta/453/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. M/S. Rasa Agrotech Private Ltd

High Court 18 Feb 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/453/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. M/S. Rasa Agrotech Private Ltd
Date of order
18 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/453/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. M/S. Rasa Agrotech Private Ltd, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 5Therefore, the appeal [filed ][by ][the Department ][is ][dismissed in]terms of the aforesaid [Circular ][No.9 ][of ][2024 ][dated 17'09'2024']However, if the [appeal comes ][within the ][exception ][of ][Circular]No.5 of 2024, it would [be open ][to ][the Income ][Tax ][Department ][to]seek reviva...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR AT HYDERABADTUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM ANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL [NO: 453 OF ][2012] Appeal filed under Section 260(4) of the [lncome-Tax ][Act ]' [1961, against ][the]order dated 18.02.2011 [passed ]in [lTA.No. ][1277lHydl2l1o ][for the ][assessment ][year]2OO7 -OB on the file of the lncome Tax [Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad Bench ]['B']Hyderabad preferred against the Order [dated ][26.07.2010 ][passed ][in ]flppeal [No]219tAcff -3(1)tClT(A)-lV/2009-10 on the [file of the ][Commissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax](Appeals)-lV, Hyderabad preferred against the Assessment Order [dated 24.12-2009]passed in PAN/GIR No. on the file of the Deputy [Commissioner ][of]lncome Tax, Circle 3(1), Hyderabad. Between: Commissioner of lncome Tax-lll, [lT Towers, A.C. Guards, ][Hyderabad] ...Appellant AND M/s. Rasa Agrotech Private LTD., Unicorn [House ][No. ][3, ][Nr. ][Gunrock Diamond]Point, Transport Road, Secunderabad [- 500 ][009] ...Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: Ms. B. Sapna Reddy Standing [Gounsel]representing Mr. J.V. Prasad SeniorStanding Counsel for the Income [Tax]Department Counsel for the Respondent : Sri [Ch Pushyam Kiran] The Court made the following: ORDER I, THE TION0URABLE [P.SAM ] ANDTHE HONOTJRABLE [RA(f]NANDIKONDA ITTA No.[4s30F ][2012] JUDGMEN'[; [r][per ][Hon'ble ][Sri ][Justice ][P.Sam ][Koshy)] Heard N[;. [B-Sapna ][Reddy, ][leamed ][Junior ][Standing] Counsel [repres'r ][lting ][Mr. ][J'V'Prasad, leamed ][Senior ][Standing]Counsel for [r-he ][Income ][Tax ][Department ][for ][the appetlant' ][Perused]the record. Thisr appeal [[under Section ]][[260A ][of ][the ][Income ]][[of ][the ][Income ]][[the ][Income ]][[Income ]][[Tax Act']] 2. Thisr appeal [[under Section ]][[260A ][of ][the ][Income ]][[of ][the ][Income ]][[the ][Income ]][[Income ]][[Tax Act']]1961, har; [bet:rt ][preferred ][by ][the ][Revenue ][as ][the ][appellant]the [orrl':r ][dated ][18.02'2011 ][passed ][by ][the ][Inconle ][Tax]against Appellate [Tri:una[, ][Hyderabad ][Bench ]['B" ][Hycterabad' ][in]I.T.A.No.1277 [for ][the ][Assessnient ][Year ][2007-08']3. Central 'loard [of ][Direct ][Taxes ][(CBDT) ][has ][issued ][(lircular]No.9 of 11024 [dated ][17.09.2024, ][amending ][the ][previous ][(lircular]No.5of20l]4rtated15.03.2024,byfurtherenhancingthemonetarylimits for filini; [appeals ][by ][the Income ][Tax ][Departmerrt ][belore ][the]Income Tax Appellate [Tribunals, ][High ][Courts and ][Supreme ][Court] , I o as a measure for reducing [litigation. ][In ][paragraph ][2 ][of ][the ][said]Circular, we find [that ][the monetary ][limit ][fixed ][for filing ][an ][appeal]before the High Court [is Rs.2.00 ][crore.] 4In the instant appeal, [tax effect ][is well ][below the ][monetary]limit. 5Therefore, the appeal [filed ][by ][the Department ][is ][dismissed in]terms of the aforesaid [Circular ][No.9 ][of ][2024 ][dated 17'09'2024']However, if the [appeal comes ][within the ][exception ][of ][Circular]No.5 of 2024, it would [be open ][to ][the Income ][Tax ][Department ][to]seek revival of the [appeal. ][There shall ][be ][no order ][as ][to costs'] 6. Consequently, miscellaneous [petitions ][pending, ][if ][any, ][shall] stand closed. Sd/. K. SRINIVASA JOINT REGISTRAR//TRUE COPY//SECTION \To, 1. The lncome [Tax ][Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad ][Bench'B' ][Hyderabad'] Z. fhe Commissionei [of lncome ][Tax ][(Appeals)-lV' ][H-yderabad']5. fn" O"prty [Commissioner ][of ][lncome Tax, Circle ][3(1)' ][Hyderabad.]io [Ms ][B. ][Sapna ][Reddv ][Standing ][Counsel ][for ][lncome]5. fn" O"prty [Commissioner ][of ][lncome Tax, Circle ][3(1)' ][Hyderabad.]io [Ms ][B. ][Sapna ][Reddv ][Standing ][Counsel ][for ][lncome];. o;;-C'C Tax 6. Consequently, miscellaneous [petitions ][pending, ][if ][any, ][shall] stand closed. Sd/. K. SRINIVASA JOINT REGISTRAR//TRUE COPY//SECTION \To, 1. The lncome [Tax ][Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad ][Bench'B' ][Hyderabad'] Z. fhe Commissionei [of lncome ][Tax ][(Appeals)-lV' ][H-yderabad']5. fn" O"prty [Commissioner ][of ][lncome Tax, Circle ][3(1)' ][Hyderabad.]io [Ms ][B. ][Sapna ][Reddv ][Standing ][Counsel ][for ][lncome]5. fn" O"prty [Commissioner ][of ][lncome Tax, Circle ][3(1)' ][Hyderabad.]io [Ms ][B. ][Sapna ][Reddv ][Standing ][Counsel ][for ][lncome];. o;;-C'C Tax 5.ffi 3TffJLi?8 [h, ][El,L?;yf ][tira ][n, ][Advocate ][to ][p u ][cl]6.Two CD CoPies6.Two CD CoPiesDL/gh :l l HIGH COURT DATED:18/02120125 JUDGMENT 1TTA.No.453 of 2012 DISMISSING THE II-TAa[5]\ 1HE9[=:-=^.]r,qri-(o+q-)+/204AP2Mi,/ofa\l/z.. -:-----'?
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan