Case LawHigh Court › Itta/46/2014 Of D.s. Karunakar Reddy v....

Itta/46/2014 Of D.s. Karunakar Reddy v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 17 Dec 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/46/2014 Of D.s. Karunakar Reddy v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
17 Dec 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/46/2014 Of D.s. Karunakar Reddy v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD INCOME TAX TRIBUNA L APPEAL NO: 46 OF 2014 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260-4 of [the ][lncome ][Tax Act, ][1961,]against the order dated 3011112011 in ITA No.753/Hyd/2011 [on the ][file ][of ][the ][lncome]Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad, [the ][Assessment ][Year ][2003']2004, [preferred ]against the order dated [231021201 ]1 in [No.0976 ]& [0977/CC-6,]Hyd/ClT(A)-ll09-10 on the file of the Commissioner of [lncome ][Tax ][(Appeals-l),]Hyderabad, preferred against the order dated [3111212009 ][in ][PAN/GIR No. AHCPC ][-]0573C on the file of the Deputy Commissioner of [lncome ][Tax, ][Central ][Circle-6]Hyderabad. Between: D.S.KARUNAKAR REDDY, Flat No.302, Sri [Lakshmi ][Nilayam ][Apartments, ][Rajeev]Nagar, Hyderabad ...APPELLANT AND DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, Central Circle [-6 ]Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant : SRI A.V.RAGHU RAMCounsel for the Respondent : SRI B.NARASIMHA SARMAS.C. FOR INCOME TAX The Court made the following: JUDGMENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N,I.S.RAN'IACI{ANDRA RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. AMARNATH COUD I.T.TNoo 2014 JUDGMENT : (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao) Learned counsel for appellant seeks to withdraw this Appeal toinitiate proceedings under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme declared by theGovemment of India.initiate proceedings under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme declared by theGovemment of India. Granting liberty to revive the Appeal in the event tlie appellantdoes not get satisfactory result in the said Scheme, this appeal isdismissed as withdrawn. No costs. HIGH COURT DATED:1711212020 JUDGMENT ITTA.No.46 of 2014 Dismissing the Appeal as withdrawn HesrAkoo23J[I]N2821?-** DiJ I
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan