Itta/462/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hyd v. M/S Devgen Seeds And Crop Technology Pvt Ltd., Hyd
High Court
18 Sep 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/462/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hyd v. M/S Devgen Seeds And Crop Technology Pvt Ltd., Hyd
Date of order
18 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/462/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hyd v. M/S Devgen Seeds And Crop Technology Pvt Ltd., Hyd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Recording the said statement, these appeals are dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforestated.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE K.LAKSHMAN
I .T.T.A.Nos.84 OF 2010, 554 OF 2010, 471 OF 2015, 516 OF 2015,522 OF 2015, 525 OF 2015, 92 OF 2017, 196 OF 2017, 288 OF2017, 462 OF 2017, 705 OF 2017, 42 OF 2018, 296 OF 2018, 302OF 2018, 306 OF 2018, 571 OF 2018, 608 OF 2018, 29 OF 2019and 104 OF 2019
JUDGMENT:(per SK,J)
Sri B.Narasimha Sarma, learned senior standing counsel for the appellant-Revenue, states that these appeals no longer survive for consideration in view of the fact that the tax/duty effect is less than the monetary limit fixed by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, vide Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 and Circular No.23 of 2019 dated 06.09.2019. Liberty is however sought by the learned senior standing counsel for restoration of the appeals in the event any of the exceptions have application.
2. Recording the said statement, these appeals are dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforestated. Pending miscellaneous petitions,
if any, shall also stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
________________
SANJAY KUMAR,J
Date:18.09.2019
_____________
K.LAKSHMAN,J
KL
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue