Itta/463/2012 Of M/S.imerys Ceramics [India] Pvt Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
06 Sep 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/463/2012 Of M/S.imerys Ceramics [India] Pvt Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
06 Sep 2021
Assessment year(s)
2006-2007
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/463/2012 Of M/S.imerys Ceramics [India] Pvt Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT FOR THE S]AT HYDE#JiDOF
MON?IY_.IIE sixTH DAY OF sEPrEr\rBERTWo THoUSAND AND rwervry or.re
HONOURABLE TH E ACTI NG S RI M.S.RAMACHAND RA RAO"'#5.:5i,IE rHE HoNouReere s$I?slcE r.vtNoD KUMAR
Income Tax Tribunar Appear under sectron 260-4 of the Income Tax Act, 196.1 ,against the order dated o2lo7l2o12 in lrA No.43/Hyd/2oio-A.y. 2006-2007 on the fite ofthe Income Tax Apperrate Tribunar, Hyderabad Bench 'B' Hyderabad, the AssessmentYear 2006-2007, preferred against the order dated 15/06/2010 in Appeat No.trA0156/clr(a)-lll 09-10 on the flle of the commissioner of lncome Tax (Appears-V),Hyderabad, preferred against the order dated 30/1 1/2009 in GIR J-o43/AAACJ74240 onthe file of the lncome Tax Officer, Ward, Circle 2(1 ), Hyderabad.against the order dated o2lo7l2o12 in lrA No.43/Hyd/2oio-A.y. 2006-2007 on the fite ofthe Income Tax Apperrate Tribunar, Hyderabad Bench 'B' Hyderabad, the AssessmentYear 2006-2007, preferred against the order dated 15/06/2010 in Appeat No.trA0156/clr(a)-lll 09-10 on the flle of the commissioner of lncome Tax (Appears-V),Hyderabad, preferred against the order dated 30/1 1/2009 in GIR J-o43/AAACJ74240 onthe file of the lncome Tax Officer, Ward, Circle 2(1 ), Hyderabad.
Between:
tril/s.lmerys Ceramics India] Pvt Ltd., 4th Floor, Koti's Court,Raj Bhavan Road,Somajiguda, Hyderabad....APPELLANTSomajiguda, Hyderabad....APPELLANT
AND
The Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle-2 [1], Hyderabad
..RESPONDENT
r.A.NO.1 0F 2021:
Petition under Section 151 of CPC [praying ][that ][in ][the circumstances stated ][in the]affidavit filed therewith, the Hon'ble court [may ][be ][pleased ][to ][permit ][the ][appellant]company to withdraw the appeal for Asst. [Year 2007-2008 bearing ITTA No.463 ][ol ][2012]under the VSV Scheme [in ]the [interest ][of ][justice.]
For the Appellant : SRI Y.RATNAKAR, [Advocate]
For the Respondent : SRI B.NARASIMHA [SARMA, SC l.T. ][DEPT.]
The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI M.S.RAMACHANDRA
AND
HONOURABLE [JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR]
I.A. No.1 of 2O21INfAND
I.T.T.A. No.463 OF [2O12]
cOMMON ORDER:[ (Pet the ][Acting ][Chief ][Justice ][Si ][M S.Ramachandra ][Rao)]
The appellant has filed [I'A.No' ]1 [of ][2O2l ][seeking]permission to withdraw the appeal in view of the order [in]Form No.3 dated 13.01.2021 passed under the Direct TaxVivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
2. Having regard to the said plea, LA.No.1 of 202 1 isordered and ITTA. No.zi63 of 2012 is dismissed as u,ithdrawnin the er.ent, the appellant does not get lavourable reliefunder the said scheme, it is granted liberty to revive thisiL1;pe a1
3Pending miscellaleous petitions, if any, in this appealshall also stand dismissedshall also stand dismissed
Sd/-[/.SANTHI VARDHANI.,OINT REGISTRAR@SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To1.The Chairman, lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Bench 'B', Hyderabad.2.The Commissioner of lncome Tax Appeal -2(1), Hyderabad.1.The Chairman, lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Bench 'B', Hyderabad.2.The Commissioner of lncome Tax Appeal -2(1), Hyderabad.2The lncome Tax Officer, Circle-2(1), Hyderabad.4.One CC to Sri Y,Ratnakar, Advocate (OPUC)5.One CC to Sri B,Narasimha Sarma, Advocate (OPUC)6.Two CD Copies7.One Spare CopyKjKj
HIGH COURT
DATED:06/09/2021
COMMON
l,A.No.1 of [2021]ln/andITTA.No.463 [oi ][2012]
I.A. OROERED.ITTA DISMISSING AS WITHDRAWN.
4-a2tt1C)UL'L1SEP*.tIIF-piad
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.