Case LawHigh Court › Itta/464/2010 Of Kakatiya Cement Sugar A...

Itta/464/2010 Of Kakatiya Cement Sugar And Industries Ltd v. Depty Ccommissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 12 Jun 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/464/2010 Of Kakatiya Cement Sugar And Industries Ltd v. Depty Ccommissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
12 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/464/2010 Of Kakatiya Cement Sugar And Industries Ltd v. Depty Ccommissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: As prayed for, the present appeal stands dismissed aswithdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT THURSDAY, TWO THOUSAND PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE [P.SAM KOSHY]ANDTHE HONOURABLE [JUSTrcE ] eal No.[464][ of ][2010] Tribunal A Income Ta[x] Income [Tax ][Tribunai ][Appeal ][Under ][Section ][260 ][of ][the ][Income ][Tax ][Act']against the [order ][of ][the ][Income ][Tax Appellate ][Tribunal' ][Hyderabad ][Bench "8" ][']Hyderabad [in ][ITA.No.716 ][/IHYD]20O5 ][for ][the ][assessment ][yeats ][1999-2000 ][dated]24.04.2009 [preferred ][against ][the Order ][of ][the ][Commissioner ][of ][Income ][Tax](AppealsJll), [Hyderabad, ][Appeal ][No'90/ACIT2(1)/CIT(A)-III/04-05 ][dated]10.\2.2004. Between:and Industries [Ltd, ][1-10-140/1, ][Gurukrupa' ][Ashok Nagar']Kakatiya [Cement Sugar]Hvderibad [- ][5oo o2o.]. " [APPellant'] AND Deputy [Commissioner ][of ][Income ][Tax' ][Circle-2 [1]' 8tr'Floor' ] [Towers' ][AC Guards']Hyderabad..Respondent. Counsel [for ][the ][Appellant: ][Sri ] [V Narasimham'] Counsel for [the ][ResPondent: --] The Court [made ][the ][following: JUDGMENT] TIIE.HOII'BLE SRT r'USTICE P.SA}I KOSITY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA INCOME TA)( TRIBUNAL APPEAI, No.464 oF 20ro JUDGMENT: (per Hon'ble Sn Justice p.Sam Koshg) Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counselfor the appellant submits that the appelrant has settled the disputewith the department under the vivad Se vishwass scheme a,d henceprays for withdrawal of the instant appeat.for the appellant submits that the appelrant has settled the disputewith the department under the vivad Se vishwass scheme a,d henceprays for withdrawal of the instant appeat. 2. As prayed for, the present appeal stands dismissed aswithdrawn. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/- MOHD.ISMAILDEPUW REGISTRAR //TRUECOPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench,,B,,, Hyderabad.[[']][[']] Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench,,B,,, 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals-Ill), Hyderabad [[']] 3. One CC to Sri C.V.Narasimham, Advocate TOPUC]TOPUC] 4. Two CD Copies. w lcK/PSL HIGHCOURT DATED:72/06/2025 JUDGMENT: ITTA No.464 of 2010 Dismissing the I.T.T.A. as withdrawan.(+-{ZSx-\ ..1HES[I]4€(at\oi,1EAlJBMot O5-1,-..-.,,:i
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan