Itta/464/2010 Of Kakatiya Cement Sugar And Industries Ltd v. Depty Ccommissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
12 Jun 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/464/2010 Of Kakatiya Cement Sugar And Industries Ltd v. Depty Ccommissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
12 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/464/2010 Of Kakatiya Cement Sugar And Industries Ltd v. Depty Ccommissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: As prayed for, the present appeal stands dismissed aswithdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT
THURSDAY, TWO THOUSAND
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE [P.SAM KOSHY]ANDTHE HONOURABLE [JUSTrcE ]
eal No.[464][ of ][2010]
Tribunal A
Income Ta[x]
Income [Tax ][Tribunai ][Appeal ][Under ][Section ][260 ][of ][the ][Income ][Tax ][Act']against the [order ][of ][the ][Income ][Tax Appellate ][Tribunal' ][Hyderabad ][Bench "8" ][']Hyderabad [in ][ITA.No.716 ][/IHYD]20O5 ][for ][the ][assessment ][yeats ][1999-2000 ][dated]24.04.2009 [preferred ][against ][the Order ][of ][the ][Commissioner ][of ][Income ][Tax](AppealsJll), [Hyderabad, ][Appeal ][No'90/ACIT2(1)/CIT(A)-III/04-05 ][dated]10.\2.2004.
Between:and Industries [Ltd, ][1-10-140/1, ][Gurukrupa' ][Ashok Nagar']Kakatiya [Cement Sugar]Hvderibad [- ][5oo o2o.]. " [APPellant']
AND
Deputy [Commissioner ][of ][Income ][Tax' ][Circle-2 [1]' 8tr'Floor' ] [Towers' ][AC Guards']Hyderabad..Respondent.
Counsel [for ][the ][Appellant: ][Sri ] [V Narasimham']
Counsel for [the ][ResPondent: --]
The Court [made ][the ][following: JUDGMENT]
TIIE.HOII'BLE SRT r'USTICE P.SA}I KOSITY
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
INCOME TA)( TRIBUNAL APPEAI, No.464 oF 20ro
JUDGMENT:
(per Hon'ble Sn Justice p.Sam Koshg)
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counselfor the appellant submits that the appelrant has settled the disputewith the department under the vivad Se vishwass scheme a,d henceprays for withdrawal of the instant appeat.for the appellant submits that the appelrant has settled the disputewith the department under the vivad Se vishwass scheme a,d henceprays for withdrawal of the instant appeat.
2. As prayed for, the present appeal stands dismissed aswithdrawn.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall
stand closed.
SD/- MOHD.ISMAILDEPUW REGISTRAR
//TRUECOPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench,,B,,, Hyderabad.[[']][[']]
Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench,,B,,, 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals-Ill), Hyderabad [[']]
3. One CC to Sri C.V.Narasimham, Advocate TOPUC]TOPUC]
4. Two CD Copies.
w
lcK/PSL
HIGHCOURT
DATED:72/06/2025
JUDGMENT:
ITTA No.464 of 2010
Dismissing the I.T.T.A. as withdrawan.(+-{ZSx-\
..1HES[I]4€(at\oi,1EAlJBMot O5-1,-..-.,,:i
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.