Case Law › High Court › Itta/467/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itta/467/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri Raghunath Mittal

High Court 25 Jul 2014 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

25 Jul 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/467/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri Raghunath Mittal, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, this appeal is also dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABADFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRAPRADESH PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. NO.467 OF 2014 DATED:25.7.2014 Between: Commissioner of Income Tax-VI.T. Towers, A.C. GuardsHyderabad … Appellant And Sri Raghunath MittalProp. Raghunath & Co.,7-2-53/4, NH-7 RoadAdilabad … Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. NO.467 OF 2014 JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) On identical issue this Court dismissed an appeal, being I.T.T.A.No.407 of 2014, by judgment dt.09.07.2014. Hence, this appeal is also dismissed. There will be no order asto costs. ________________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ _______________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 25.7.2014 bnr

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.