Itta/474/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.a.venkateswarlu And Co
High Court
06 Dec 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/474/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.a.venkateswarlu And Co
Date of order
06 Dec 2012
Assessment year(s)
2004-05
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/474/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.a.venkateswarlu And Co, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed at the stage of admission. _________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 6[th] December, 2012 GRR _______________________________ M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
ITTA No.474 of 2012
Dated: 06-12-2012
Between:
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Guntur.
And
M/s A. Venkateswarlu and Co.,Ongole, Prakasam Dist.
…Appellant
…Respondent.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
ITTA No. 474 of 2012
Judgment:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram)
We see no question of law let alone a substantial question oflaw arising in this appeal preferred by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
The Revenue preferred this appeal against the order dated 23-1-2009 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘B’ Bench inITA No. 766/Hyd/2008. The only issue presented for consideration inthis appeal is “whether the Tribunal erred in estimating the net profitsof the assessee (for the Assessment year 2004-05) at 8% as againstthe Assessing Officer’s estimate of 12.5%”.
The Tribunal has recorded cogent reasons for arriving at the netprofits, at 8% of the gross receipts. The Tribunal stated that the rate of12.5% assumed by the Assessing Officer is excessive since a similarassessee, one A.Venkateswarlu who undertakes similar type of worksas the present assessee was assessed to profits at 5% of the grossreceipt.
In the circumstances above, the Tribunal on a rationalassessment of the relevant circumstances and on a comparativeanalysis of the view taken in respect of similarly placed contractors, inwhose case the assessing officer had himself taken a view that thepercentage of profits would be 5% of the gross receipts, arrived at theestimated net income at 8% of the gross receipts. This is a finding of
fact on analysis of the relevant criteria, not amenable to appellatescrutiny as a substantial question of law.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed at the stage of admission.
_________________________
GODA RAGHURAM, J
6[th] December, 2012
GRR
_______________________________
M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.