Itta/476/2018 Of Sri Kolluri Ramaswamy v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
22 Jan 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Itta/476/2018 Of Sri Kolluri Ramaswamy v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
22 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/476/2018 Of Sri Kolluri Ramaswamy v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the Income Tax Tribunal Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
APHC010736062018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADAT AMARAVATI [3516](Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURHANTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 476/2018
Between:
Sri Kolluri Ramaswamy
AND
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Counsel for the Appella
Counsel for the Appella
1.DUNDU MANMOHAN
Counsel for the Respondent:dent:
Counsel for the Respondent:dent:
1.K RAJI REDDY(SENIOR SC_ INCOME TAX DEPT)
NIOR SC_ INCOME TAX DEPT)
I.T.T.A.No.476 of 2018
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Krishna Mohan)
The learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Appeal, for which, he addressed a letter dated 21.01.2025 to the Registrar (Judicial).
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Income Tax Tribunal Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________
JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN
22.01.2025 MDP
________________________
________________________JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue