Itta/477/2017 Of Prl Commr Of Income Tax-2, Hyderabad v. M/S Hyderabad Menzies Air Cargo [P] Ltd., Ranga Reddy Dist
High Court
11 Jul 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/477/2017 Of Prl Commr Of Income Tax-2, Hyderabad v. M/S Hyderabad Menzies Air Cargo [P] Ltd., Ranga Reddy Dist
Date of order
11 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/477/2017 Of Prl Commr Of Income Tax-2, Hyderabad v. M/S Hyderabad Menzies Air Cargo [P] Ltd., Ranga Reddy Dist, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Therefore, appellant would like to withdraw the appeal 5. in view of the above, this appeal is dismissed onwithdrawal 6.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABADAT HYDERABAD
MONDAY ,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYANArrdTHE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO:477 OF 2017
Appeal Under Section 2604 of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 aggrievedagainst the order dated 06-10-20'16 in rrA No. 421 tHyDt 2015 (AssessmentYear 2009 -2ol o) on the fire of the rncome Tax Apperate Tribunar , Hyderabad"B" Bench , Hyderabad preferred against the order of the commissioner oflncome Tax ( Appears ) -2 , Hyderabad dated 23-02-2015 in rrA No. 0565 /DC -2(2) I CIT (A) -2 I 2011 -12 preferred against the order of the DeputyCommissioner of lncome Tax Circle -2 (2) , Hyderabad dated 30-12_201,1 inPAN / clR No. AACCC961.tN/H 258
Between:
Pr. Commissioner of lncome Tax _ 2 , Hyderabad...APPELLANTAND
Rajiv M/S Hyderabad Menzies Gandhi tnternationat Air Airpori5d.il,li,rb;;,';Y;";;h"ddy cargo.[p] Ltd., Ranga Reddy.Dist, Disrrict Air Cargo _Terminal,
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appeltant: Ms. K. MAMATA CHOUDARY Sr. SC for l.T.Dept.Counsel for the Respondent: SRI CHALLA GUNARANJANCounsel for the Respondent: SRI CHALLA GUNARANJAN
The Court delivered the following: Judgment
THE HON[,BLE THE ][C] [ JUSTICE ][U] [ BHIIYAN]ANDTHE HON' [ JUSTICE ][S] [ NANDA]
ITTA NO.477 [of ][2Ol7]
JUDGMENT: [li\'r ][tte ][ttott'bie ][ttLe ][t-lrrcf ][/usrrc" ][Lial ][Bhua(t'l]
Hearcl Ms. [K.Mamta ][Choudary, ][learned ][Senior]StandingCtlunselforlncomeTaxDepartmentappearlngfor the appellant [and ][Mr. ][Challa Gunaranjan' ][learned]counsel [for ][thc ][resPondent.]
2. This appeal [has ][been ][filed ][against ][the ][order ][dated]06. 10.20 [1 ]6 [passed ][by the ][Income ][Tax Appellate Tribuna'l']HvderabadBench.8"Hyderabad1nI.T.A.No.42 I lHydl2015 [for ][the ][assessment ][year 2009-1O']
3. The appeal [was ][admitted for ][hearing on ][01'08'2017']
4. Today [learned counsel for the appellant submits ][that]on an application [filed ][by ][the respondent ][under ][the ][Direct]Ta-x Vivad [Se Vishr,r'as ][Scheme, ][2O2O, ][tk,e ][matter ][has ][been]settled bet\^'ecn [thc' ][parties ][follorving ][u'hich ][fuli ][and final]
settlement dues have been paid by the respondent.
Therefore, appellant would like to withdraw the appeal
5. in view of the above, this appeal is dismissed onwithdrawal
6. Miscellancous applications pending, if any, shal1stand closed. However, there sha1l be no order as to costs.
SD/. B.S.CHIJEEJOINTTSECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To,
'l . The lncome Tax Appetlate Tribunal , Hyderabad. B Bench, Hyderabad
2. The Gommissioner of lncome [Tax ][(Appeals ])-2, [Hyderabad]
3. The Deputy Commissioner of [lncome ][Tax ][Circle ][-2 ][(2) ], [Hyderabad]
4. One CC to SRl. K MAMATA [CHOUDARY, ][S.C ][For lncome Tax ][Dept ]
5. One CC to SRl. CHALLA [Advocate ][OPUCJ
6. Two CD Copies
7. One Spare Copy
"\.y
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 1107 t2022
JUDGMENTITTA.No.477 ot 2017
DISMISSING THE ITTA AS WiTHDRAWN.
@;5""
STATE+[\])a):.}.r;LJ[1 [\ls\l][ r$il]):.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.