Itta/478/2013 Of Albany Molecular Reasearch Hyderabad v. Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
29 Apr 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/478/2013 Of Albany Molecular Reasearch Hyderabad v. Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
29 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itta/478/2013 Of Albany Molecular Reasearch Hyderabad v. Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the same, IA.No.I of 2O2L is allowed andconsequently, the Appeal is dismissed as withdrarvn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF APRILTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
t.A.NO.1 0F 2021IN/AND
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 478 OF 2013
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260 of the lncome Tax Act, againstthe order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ['B', ][Hyderabad ][in]lTA.No.1625/H12010, tor assessment [year ]2006-2007 dated 19.04.2013 [preferred]against the Order of the Commissioner of [lncome ][Tax, ][Hyderabad, ][preferred against]the Order of the Deputy Commissioner of [lncome ]Tax [Transfer ][Pricing-ll']PAN/GlR.No.AAAFCA1469D dated 25.06.2013.
Between:
Albany tVlolecular Reasearch Hyderabad, [Research Centre Pvt. Ltd, ][Hyderabad.]
...APPELLANT
AND
The Assistant Commissioner of lncome [Tax, Circle-1 (1), ][Hyderabad.]
...RESPONDENT
r.A.NO.1 0F 2021
Petition Under Section 151 [of ][cPC ][praying ][that ][in ][the ][circumstances ][stated ][in]the Memorandum of Grounds [of ][ITTA, ][the ][High ][court ][may ][be ][pleased ][to ][permit ][the]Appellant company to withdraw [the ][present Appeal ][for ][Assessment ][Year ][2006-2007]bearing ITTA.No.478 ol 2013 [under ][the ][vsv ][scheme ][in ][the ][interest ][of ][Justice ][and ][be]pleased to pass such other order or orders.
Counsel for the Appellant: [SRl. ][Y' ]
Counsel forthe [Respondent: ][SRl. ][K. RAJI ]
(SENIOR SC FOR INCOME TAX DEPT)
The Court delivered the [following: ]
HONOURABI.,E SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
AND
HONOUIIABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
IA.No.1 of 2O2Lln andITTA.No.478 of 2O13
JUDGMENT: per Si Justice IuL S. Ramachandra Rao)
Counsel for the appellant has frled IA.No.l of 2021seeking permission to withdraw the Appeal on the groundthat the Designated Authority has passed orderdt.05.04.2021 in Form-3 under Vivaad Se Vishwas Act,2020.
2. In view of the same, IA.No.I of 2O2L is allowed andconsequently, the Appeal is dismissed as withdrarvn. Noorder as to costs.
3. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if arry, shallstand closed.
Sd/- K.SRINIVAS RAOJOINT REGISTRAR)\-.-
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad ['B' ][Bench, ][Hyderabad.]
2. One CC to Sri Y. Ratnakar, Advocate IOPUCI
3. One CC to Sri. K. Raji Reddy [(Senior ]SC [for ][lncome ][Tax ][Dept) ] 4. Two CD Copiesgbr\ M.
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2910412021
JUDGMENT!.A.NO.1 0F 2021IN/ANDITTA.No.4tB of 2013
DISMISSING THE CMAAS WITHDRAWN
t[b]
1HESrA 14:ik5[e]oo10 [2021](:i"c..\'*n n
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.