Case LawHigh Court › Itta/48/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Itta/48/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr.rameshwarlal Gehlot

High Court 03 Dec 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/48/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr.rameshwarlal Gehlot
Date of order
03 Dec 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/48/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr.rameshwarlal Gehlot, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The miscellaneous petition filed in this appeal shallalso stand disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDYANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDARAMI.T.T.A.No.48 of 2004 JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J) This appeal is preferred by the Revenue against theorder, dated 30.09.2002 passed by the Hyderabad Benchof the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal inI.T.A.No.918/Hyd/96. Across the Bar, it is brought to our notice thatidentical appeal that too against the respondent hereinbeing I.T.T.A.No.300 of 2003 was filed and the same wasdismissed by this Court on 12.11.2014. Following the same, we dismissed this appeal also. The miscellaneous petition filed in this appeal shallalso stand disposed of. There shall be no order as tocosts. ____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J ______________________ CHALLA KODANDARAM, J Date: 03.12.2014JSU THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDYAND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM JSU I.T.T.A.No.48 of 2004 Date: 03.12.2014
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan