Case LawHigh Court › Itta/487/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itta/487/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income - Tax Ii v. Transport Corporation Of India Limited

High Court 22 Oct 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/487/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income - Tax Ii v. Transport Corporation Of India Limited
Date of order
22 Oct 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/487/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income - Tax Ii v. Transport Corporation Of India Limited, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: As a sequel to the dismissal of the appeal, all theinterim applications stand dismissed. ______________________ Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, CJ.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRAPRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OFOCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICESRI KALYAN JYOTI SEN GUPTA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU I.T.T.A. No.487 OF 2013 Between: The Commissioner of Income Tax-II,Hyderabad ..... Petitioner AND M/s. Transport Corporation of India Limited,306 and 307, third floor, Ashoka Bhoopal Chambers,SP Road, Secunderabad .....Respondent The Court made the following : JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri K.J. Sengupta) Appeal is dismissed due to non-furnishing of thecertified copy of the impugned judgment and order. However, liberty is given to file fresh appeal within thirtydays, failing which the issue will close chapter. No orderas to costs. As a sequel to the dismissal of the appeal, all theinterim applications stand dismissed. ______________________ Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, CJ. October 22, 2013MAS _____________ K.C. Bhanu, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan