Case LawHigh Court › Itta/489/2011 Of M/S. Unicorn Agrotech L...

Itta/489/2011 Of M/S. Unicorn Agrotech Ltd v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 16 Mar 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/489/2011 Of M/S. Unicorn Agrotech Ltd v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
16 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/489/2011 Of M/S. Unicorn Agrotech Ltd v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT f E oF rELANGANA ^,8fJ#.^Blt TUESDAY, THE S*rw o i, o'ud ill1TJ T.re Irof,H " rw o i, o'ud ill1TJ T.re Irof,H " THE H.N.URABLE SRI JPRESENTM's'RAMA.HANDRA RAorHE HoNouRor.. $lLt iRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR I.T.T.A, NO: 489 oF2011 lncome Tax Tribunt;;:ll;lJli"";#, [Ti!i'H':::5:,:61.4 ]['r'lhe ][nc.me ][rax ][Ac, ][1e6]preferred asainst the o:vd/2oo7t"""""tt rlJiii,',;, ilil:*:,Tffi:r;:#:*: ",,nc.me [rax ][(Appea ][s,. ]vH::i^:iti,il":;,,,J;il1;;ff: No.AAACU278 t' o"* ;;;;.":l :::::Tffi'; ,r,un ffi;:::o"r"o!i)u,,"o" ;;:ll;lJli"";#, [Ti!i'H':::5:,:61.4 ]['r'lhe ][nc.me ][rax ][Ac, ][1e6]preferred asainst the o:vd/2oo7t"""""tt rlJiii,',;, ilil:*:,Tffi:r;:#:*: ",,nc.me [rax ][(Appea ][s,. ]vH::i^:iti,il":;,,,J;il1;;ff: No.AAACU278 t' o"* ;;;;.":l :::::Tffi'; ,r,un ffi;:::o"r"o!i)u,,"o" Between: $";,;3i[,ffi'fr ;-!i',*,g1,']*rrli*TflIp}#nl;dai#f {:r ...APPELLANT AND The Asst. Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle_3(3), Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT For the Appeltant : SRI CH.PUSHYAM K|RAN, AdvocateFor the Respondent : sRr B'NARASTMHA SARMA, Sc for Income Tax Department The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE [M.S.RAMACHANDRA ] AND THE HONOURABLB STICE ][T. ] I.T.T.A.No.489 of 2011 JUDGMENT:[(Per ][Hon'ble ][Sri ][Justice ][M.S. ][Ramacl.randra Rao)] Learned counsel fol appellant seeks [to ][withdrau ][this Appeal ][to]approach the respondents under the Direct Taxes [(Vivad ]Se Vishwas)Act,2020. I{aving regard to the said submission, this appeal is dismissedas withdrawn, with liberly to approach this Courl in the event there isno resolution of the dispute of the petitioner with the f)epartmentunder the said Act. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneor.rs petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/.B.S.CHIRANJEEVIJOINT REGISTH,TRUE COPY//SECTION OFFICERToi i 2. 1 ]fe [lncome ][Tax ][Appellate ][Trib]nat, ][Hyderabad ]-B [Bench, ]Hyderabad.The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-lV, Hyderabad.: 9. In" [Assistant Commissioner ][of ][tncbrirb ][fax, ][Ciicr<j-s13), ]HyderabaO.I 4. One CC to Sri Ch.Pushyam Kiran, Advocate (OPUC)' [''], 5. one cc to sri B.Narasiinha Sarma, SC for rn'come iax Department (opuc)i 6. Two CD CopiesKj.z2r-." HIGH COURT DATED:16/03/2021 JUDGMENTITTA.No.489 of 2011I ITTA DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN NO COSTS. :i ytE $ ,rr/tC)14 [App ][?:t']\
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan