Itta/492/2011 Of Deloitte Consulting India Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
29 Apr 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/492/2011 Of Deloitte Consulting India Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
29 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/492/2011 Of Deloitte Consulting India Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
,"\
TELANGANAHrGH couRr [t?T ]I?BSIIrEoF
THURSDAY, '' [,-' ] THOUSAND }WO
t'[tt?5$'t' -AM Ac H AN D RA RAoTHE HONOURABLE r'vlNoD
THE HoNouRor., 'f'l''utrlcE
t.T.T.A. [NO: ][49][20][ F][ 2011]
lncome [Tax Tribunal Appeal under ][Selction ][260-A ][of ][the ][lncome Tax ][Act' ][against]theorderofthelncomeTaxAppellateTribunal,HyderabadBench.A'HyderabadinlTANo'1084/Hyd/20l0forassessmentyear2oo4-2oosdaled22lOTl2ollpreferredagainstthe order of [the ][Commissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax ][(Appeals)-lll' ][Hyderabad' ][Appeal]No.0062/ClT [(A)-lll/08-09 ][dated ][31/05/2010' preferred against ][the ][order ][of ][the]Dy.Commissioner [of ][lncome ][Tax, ][Circle ][-1(2)' ][PAN/GIR NoAABCD0476H ][dated]28t1212006.
Between:
DELOITTE CONSULTTNG [tNDtA PRIVATE LIMITED, ][O/o.7th ][Floor, Lingapur ][House']Amrutha Estate, Himayath [Nagar, ][Hyderabad ]...A''ELLANT
AND
THE DEPUTY COIMMISSIoNER [TAX, Circle ][1 ][2], [lT ][Towers, ][Hyderabad]
...RESPONDENT
For the Appellant : SRI J.V.RAO, AdvocateFor the Respondent : SRI J.V.PRASAD, SC FOR INCOME TAX
The Court made the following: ORDER
To
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
AND
HONOITRABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
ITTA.No.492 of 20Lt
JUDGMENT: per Si Justice M.S.Ramachandra Rao)
counsei for the appellant has addressed a ietterdt.22.04.2021 to the Registrar(Judicial), High court forthe State of Telangana, Hyderabad, seeking permission towithdraw the Appeal on the ground that an applicationhas been made to the Central Board of Direct Taxes(CBDT) by the appellant under the Direct Tax Vivaad. SeVishwas Acl,2O2O.
2. I{aving rr:gard to the said submission, this Appeal isdismissed as trithdrawn with liberty to seek restoration ofthe appeal in t-he event there is no satisfactory resolutionunder the said Act. No order as to costs.
3. Consequr:ntly, miscellaneous petitions pending, il
any, shall stzLnd closed.
Sd/.K.SREENIVASA RAOJOINT REGISRSF-CTION OFFICER
,TRUE COPY'
1. The lncome [Tax Appellate ][Tribunal, ][Hyd-erabad ]["A" Bench' Hyderabad']
Z. One CC to Sri -'J.V.Fiao, [Advocate ][(OPUC) ]
-'J.V.Fiao, 5. Onu CC to Sri [.J.V.Prasad, ][Advocate (OPUC)]4. Two CD [Copies]Kj.
\
a
DATED:29t04t2021
JUDGMENTITTA.No.492 of 2011
DISD. AS WITHDRAWN THE ITTA.
HE [Sra ],t(,}JczLr0 S [.iili ][2021].)l\Ir
6,?1
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.