Case LawHigh Court › Itta/494/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itta/494/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -1 v. Harmahendar Singh Bagga

High Court 06 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/494/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -1 v. Harmahendar Singh Bagga
Date of order
06 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/494/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -1 v. Harmahendar Singh Bagga, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY I.T.T.A.No.494 of 2015 JUDGMENT:(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan) Sri J.V.Prasad, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the IncomeTax Department, would fairly state that the question of law, whicharises for consideration in this appeal, also arose for consideration inI.T.T.A.No.711 of 2014 in relation to the very same assessee and thesaid appeal was dismissed by this Court on 17.12.2014. Following the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court inI.T.T.A.No.711 of 2014 dated 17.12.2014, and in terms thereof, thisappeal is also dismissed. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also standdismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J Date: 06.01.2016JSU ___________________________________ M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY JSU I.T.T.A.No.494 of 2015 Date: 06.01.2016
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan