Case LawHigh Court › Itta/499/2011 Of M/S The Singareni Colli...

Itta/499/2011 Of M/S The Singareni Collieries Company Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another

High Court 30 Apr 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/499/2011 Of M/S The Singareni Collieries Company Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another
Date of order
30 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
2000-2001
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/499/2011 Of M/S The Singareni Collieries Company Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: VINOD KUMAR t.T.T.A.o.499 of [20l ]l JUDG MENT:[(I'er Hon'ble ][Sri ][Justice ][M.S. ][Ramachandra Rao)] Leamed [counsel ][for ][the ][appellant ][filed ][a ][letter ][dt'29-04-2021]before the [Registrar ][(Judicial), ][High ][Court ][of ][Telangana' ][Hyderabad]seeking [to ][withdraw ][this ][Appea...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRILTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR INCOME TAX TRIBUNA L APPEAL NO: 499 OF 2011 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260 of the lncome Tax Act, againstthe order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B', Hyderabad inthe order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B', Hyderabad inlTA.No.490/H/2007, for assessment year 2000-2001 dated 31.03.2011 preferredagainst the Order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax Appeals Vi.jayawada, AppealNo.204lKMlt//ClT(AyV/05-06, preferred against the Order of lhe AssistantCommissioner of lncome Tax Circle-'l , Khammam. PAN/GlR.No.AACTBB73 F/T 101dated 27.01 .2006.Between:dated 27.01 .2006.Between: M/s. The Singareni corrieries c_ompany Ltd., A pubric Limited company,lncorporated under the Rep. by its chairmin and Managing oireiioi. Frwisrohs orcompanies Act, 1956,,Hbvin!; its Registered ont" zi "x"iniduJem-66iieries,Kothagudem-sO7 10't, Khamma-'m Olstricl ...APPELLANT AND J. Commlssioner of lncome Tax, Vijayawada. 2. Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle 1, Khammam ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: SRI. K VIVEK REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: SRt. J V PRASAD (SC FOR INCOME TAX)The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT /( \ THE HONOUI{ABLE [M.S.RAMACHANDR,{ ] ANI) .THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR t.T.T.A.o.499 of [20l ]l JUDG MENT:[(I'er Hon'ble ][Sri ][Justice ][M.S. ][Ramachandra Rao)] Leamed [counsel ][for ][the ][appellant ][filed ][a ][letter ][dt'29-04-2021]before the [Registrar ][(Judicial), ][High ][Court ][of ][Telangana' ][Hyderabad]seeking [to ][withdraw ][this ][Appeal stating that the dispute ][between ][the]appellant [and ][the ][respondent ][has been settled ][through ][Direct ][Tax]Vivad Se [Vishrvas ][Scheme, ][2020 ][of ][the ][Central ][Government'] Ilecorcling [the ][sarne' ][this Appeal is ][dismissed ][as ][withdlarvn ][No] c osts. As a [sequel, miscellaneous ][petitions pending' ][if ][any' ][in ][this] Appeal shall [stanri ][closed']AS sdl[. ][K.SRINIV]ISTRARJOINT //TRUE SECTION To,1.The [rncome ][Tax ][Appelrate ][Tribunal Hyderabad 'B' Bench' Hyderabad]2.One [to ][Sri ][l" ][Vivek ][ReddY' ][Advocate 3.One [to ][Sri ] [U. ]''"tud [tt" ] [TAX) 4Two [CD CoPies]gbr\jF,- HIGH COURT DATED: 3010412021 JUDGMENT lTTA.No.499 of [2011] DISMISSING AS WITHDRA\ryN@t 1HE [9IA]c[+]t-)?))10 [iijl! ][202,l]nI\r,).\ \r..t\O5:-r,:,j'''-{r..\:
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan