Case Law › High Court › Itta/499/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itta/499/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. M/S. Nagarjuan Construction Co. Ltd

High Court 31 Jul 2014 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

31 Jul 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/499/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. M/S. Nagarjuan Construction Co. Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, this appeal is also dismissed. _________________ K.J.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO I.T.T.A. No. 499 of 2014 DATED:31.07.2014 Between:The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central),Hyderabad. … Appellant And M/s. Nagarjuna Construction Co. Ltd.,Hyderabad. ….Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA ANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO I.T.T.A. No. 499 of 2014 Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) On identical issue, this Court has dismissed an appeal, being, I.T.T.A. No. 486 of 2014. Hence, this appeal is also dismissed. _________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ _______________________ M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, J 31[st] July, 2014 Pnb

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.