Itta/50/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S..sri Satyaprakash Agarwal
High Court
03 Dec 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/50/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S..sri Satyaprakash Agarwal
Date of order
03 Dec 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/50/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S..sri Satyaprakash Agarwal, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The miscellaneous petition filed in this appeal shallalso stand disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDYANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDARAMI.T.T.A.No.50 of 2004
JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J)
This appeal is preferred by the Revenue against theorder, dated 27.12.2001 passed by the Hyderabad Benchof the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in I.T.(S.S.)A.No.205/Hyd/1997.
Learned counsel for the appellant and learnedcounsel for the respondent submit that the questions oflaw raised in this appeal were dealt with by this Court inI.T.T.A.No.112 of 2003, which was dismissed by thisCourt through judgment, dated 09.09.2014.
In that view of the matter, we dismiss this appeal
also.
The miscellaneous petition filed in this appeal shallalso stand disposed of. There shall be no order as tocosts.
____________________
L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J
______________________
CHALLA KODANDA
RAM, J
Date: 03.12.2014JSU
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
ANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
I.T.T.A.No.50 of 2004
JSU
Date: 03.12.2014
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.