Itta/50/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Sri A.satyavas Reddy
High Court
07 Aug 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/50/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Sri A.satyavas Reddy
Date of order
07 Aug 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/50/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Sri A.satyavas Reddy, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Therefore, this appeal is also dismissed. _____________________ K.J.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH ATHYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAAND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
I.T.T.A. No. 50 of 2012
DATE: 07.08.2013
Between:
The Commissioner of Income Tax-III,Hyderabad.
… Appellant
And
Sri A.B. Satyavas Reddy,Hyderabad.
… Respondent
This Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
I.T.T.A. No. 50 of 2012
JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
We have heard Sri B. Narasimha Sarma, learned counsel for theappellant and have gone through the impugned judgment and order of thelearned Tribunal.
It appears that the learned Tribunal while passing the impugned orderhas relied on its own judgment in the case of Y. Sivarama Krishna in ITA.Nos. 969 and 970/Hyd/08, dated 07.11.2008. The appeal against the earlierdecision was dismissed by this Court. Hence, the decision rendered in theearlier case has attained its finality.
Therefore, this appeal is also dismissed.
_____________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
________________
K. C. BHANU, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue