Case LawHigh Court › Itta/503/2010 Of Kailash Chand Agarwal v...

Itta/503/2010 Of Kailash Chand Agarwal v. The Income-Tax Officer

High Court 08 Sep 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/503/2010 Of Kailash Chand Agarwal v. The Income-Tax Officer
Date of order
08 Sep 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/503/2010 Of Kailash Chand Agarwal v. The Income-Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD - WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI M.S.RAMACHANDRA ANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR t.A.NO.1 0F 2021IN/ANDt.T.T.A.NO. s03 oF 2010 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section [260-4 of ][the ][lncome Tax ][Act, ][1961]against the order of the lncome [Tax ][Appellate ][Tribunal, ][Hyderabad ][Bench ]['B',]Hyderabad in ITA No.1277lHYDlzO1,, for [Assessmenl ][Year ][2005-2006 ][dated]11.09.2009 [preferred ]against the order of the [commissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax ][(Appeals)-]Vl Hyderabad, Appeal No.0365/06-07/ClT(A)/2008-2009 [dated ][30.05.2008, ][preferred]against the order of the lncome [Tax ][Officer ][ward ][10(3) ][Hyderabad PAN/GIR ][No.]ADSPA261 5A/S-5049 dated 29.1 1.2006. Between: Kailash Chand Agarwal, Secunderabad. ...APPELLANT AND The lncome-Tax Officer, Ward-10(3), [Hyderabad] ...RESPONDENT lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under section 151 CPC [praying ][that in the ][circumstances ][stated ][in]the affidavit filed therewith, [the ][Hon'ble Court may be ][pleased ][to ][in view of the order]in Form No.3 dated 01lo3l2o21 [issued ][by ][the ][Learned Principal ][clT ][Hyderabad ][1,]the Hon'ble court be [pleased ][to ][permit ][the ][petitioner ][to ][withdraw ][the ] [503 ][of]2010 for lT Asst Year 2005-06, under the [Scheme.] Counsel for the Appellant: [Y' ] Counsel for the Respondent: [B' ][NARASIMHA SARMA, ] [I'T' ][DEPT']The Court delivered the following: HONOURAqLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICESRI M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR I.A. No. I of 2O2LIN/AND I.T.T.A. No.5O3 OF 20ro COMMON WDGMENT: (per Hon'bte the Acting Chief Justice Sn M.S.Ramrrchandla Rrro) The appellant has filed I.A.No. I of 2O2L seekingpermission to withdra$, the appeal in vieu, of the order inForm No.3 datecl 01.03.2021 issued b1, the learned ClT,H.r'dcrabacl passed under the Direct Ta_x V.ivad se VishwasScheme, 2020. 2, Having regard ro rhe said plea, I.A.No. 1 of 202 1 isordered and the ITTA is dismissecl as withdrawn. ln theevent, the appellant does not get favourable reliel under thesaid scheme, he is granted liberty to revive this appeal. 3Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this appealshall also stand dismissed. No costs.shall also stand dismissed. No costs. SD/. M.SANTHI VARDHANIJOINT REGISTRAR( ,/-.ltrSECTION OFFICER ,TRUE COPY' To, 1. The Chairman, lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Bench ,B,, Hyderabad 2. The Commissioner of lncome Tax for Appeals_Vl, Hyderabad. 3. The lncome Tax Officer, Ward 10 (3), Hyderabad 4. One CC to Sri [y. ]Ratnakar, Advocate tOpUCl 5. One CC to Sri B Narasimha Sarma, (SC for LT Dept.) topUCl 6Two CD Copies7One Spare Copys [br]s [br] HIGH COURT DATED: 081091202'l COMMON JUDGMENT I.A.NO.1 0F 2021!N/ANDITTA.No.SO3 of 2010 '\flL [SlAi ]A)J-)25 [sEPz0tl]o.1,*'k ORDERING THE I.A. AND DISMISSING THE ITTAAS WITHDRAWN
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan