Case Law › High Court › Itta/505/2015 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itta/505/2015 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-(Tds) v. M/S.neeladri Chit Funds Private Ltd

High Court 06 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

06 Jan 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/505/2015 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-(Tds) v. M/S.neeladri Chit Funds Private Ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANAND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY I.T.T.A.No.505 of 2015 JUDGMENT:(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan) Both Sri B.Narasimha Sarma, learned Senior Standing Counselfor the Income Tax Department, would fairly state that the subjectmatter of this appeal is covered against the Revenue by the orderpassed by this Court in I.T.T.A.No.415 of 2014 dated 10.07.2014. Following the said judgment and in terms thereof, this appeal isalso dismissed. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall alsostand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J Date: 06.01.2016JSU ___________________________________ M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANAND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY JSU I.T.T.A.No.505 of 2015 Date: 06.01.2016

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.