Itta v. M/S Kadakatla Rice Mill, Tadepalligudem, W.g.dist
High Court
06 Dec 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta v. M/S Kadakatla Rice Mill, Tadepalligudem, W.g.dist
Date of order
06 Dec 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta v. M/S Kadakatla Rice Mill, Tadepalligudem, W.g.dist, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the light of the above, the appeals are dismissed. ___________________________ JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY 06[th] December 2017 DR _______________________ JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD
ITTA.No.289 and 511 of 2017
Date:06.12.2017
Between: Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Visakhapatnam.
.....Appellant
And: M/s Kadakatla Rice Mill, Tadepalligudem. .....RespondentCounsel for the appellant: Mr. B.Narasimha Sarma Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department The Court made the following:
.....Respondent
COMMON JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy)
These two appeals arise out of common order, dated 22.8.2016, in ITA.Nos.293 and 295/Vizag/2015 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, Visakhapatnam (for short ‘the Tribunal’) pertaining to the Assessment Years 2004-05 and 2006-07. The said appeals were filed by the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
During the hearing of the appeals before the Tribunal, learned counsel for the assessee has pointed that the tax effect involved in the appeals was less than Rs.20 lakhs and that, therefore, following Circular No.21 of 2015, dated 10.12.2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the appeals are not maintainable. On recording that the departmental representative has not raised any objection to the said submission of the representative of the assessee, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals.
In the present appeal, the Revenue has raised a specific ground that though these cases fall below the monetary limit prescribed under the said Circular, they fall under exception-(c) of paragraph-8 of the said Circular, which pertains to cases involving the Revenue Audit Objection.
In our opinion, having not raised the plea that these cases fall under exception-(c) of paragraph-8 of the said Circular before the Tribunal, the Revenue cannot be permitted to raise the said plea for the first time before this Court.
In the light of the above, the appeals are dismissed.
___________________________ JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
06[th] December 2017 DR
_______________________ JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.