Case LawHigh Court › Itta/514/2012 Of B.narasimha Reddy v. Th...

Itta/514/2012 Of B.narasimha Reddy v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 28 Apr 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/514/2012 Of B.narasimha Reddy v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
28 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/514/2012 Of B.narasimha Reddy v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT FOR THE MONDAY ,THE TWO THOUSAND AND PRESENT THE HONOURABLE [JUSTIGE P.SAM KOSHY]ANDTHE HONOURABLE INCOME TAX TRIB [| ][514 ][0F ][2012] lncome Tax Tribunal [Appeal Under Section 260A ][of ][the lncome Tax ][Act,1961]against the order [dated ][o5to7t2o12 ][passed ][in ] [No.410/HYDl2011 ][for ][the]Aisessment [year ][2008-2009 ][on ][the file ][of the ][lncome Tax Appellate ][Tribunal,]Hyderabad Bench'A', [HYderabad.] Between: B.Narasimha Reddy, [10-3- ][1521A-101 ], [Sancher Palace, Hyderabad'] ...APPELLANT AND The Dy. Commissioner [of lncome Tax, Central Circle-6, Ayyakar ][Bhavah]L.B.Stadium Rd. [HYderabad.] ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: [SRl. ] Counsel for the Respondent: The Court made the [following: ] THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTTCE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA ITTA.No.514 oF 20L2 JUDGMENT (per I ton'bLe Si ,lustice p Sc.m Koshy) 1. 1. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counselfor the appellant entered appearance and submits that the partieshave settled their dispute under the vivad se Vishwas Scheme 2024,therefore, the appeilant does not intend to press the appea,l anyfurther. 2. Recording the above made submission, the appeal is dismissedas not pressed. 3. As a sequel, misceliarreous applications pending if any, shallapplications pending if any, shallstand ciosed. No costs. Sd/- K.SHYLESIJOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/' To, SECTION OFFICER 1. The lncome Tax Appellate [Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ]['A', ][Hyderabad] 2. One CC to SRl. K VASANTKUMAR [Advocate ] 3. Two CD Copies TPK HIGH COURT DATED:2810412025 -a=1--- [-]rj-"i\i '(i"".rii-' [-:],,.)i::, [2erl,r ][2u5]rl\,,/'\.'-).i,.,. - JUDGMENT lTTA.No.514 of 2012 ITTA IS DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED 1'y1/[T]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan