Itta/514/2013 Of National Academy Of Construction v. Assistant Director Of Income Tax(Exemptions)-1
High Court
29 Oct 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/514/2013 Of National Academy Of Construction v. Assistant Director Of Income Tax(Exemptions)-1
Date of order
29 Oct 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/514/2013 Of National Academy Of Construction v. Assistant Director Of Income Tax(Exemptions)-1, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH ATHYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAAND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A. No. 514 of 2013
DATE: 29.10.2013
Between:
M/s. National Academy of Construction,NAC Campus, Kondapur Post,Hyderabad.
… Appellant
And
Assistant Director of Income Tax,(Exemptions)-I, Hyderabad.
… Respondent
This Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A. No. 514 of 2013
JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
On identical facts, we dismissed an appeal being I.T.T.A.No.481 of
2013 on 22.10.2013 with the following observation:
“However, this order of dismissal does notforbid the appellant from taking up the point, whichmay be urged in due course, in the appeal, to bebrought before this Bench.”
Hence, we also dismiss this appeal with the similar observation.
_____________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
____________________
SANJAY KUMAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue