Case Law › High Court › Itta/514/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itta/514/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. Sri Sriram Bharath

High Court 05 Aug 2014 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

05 Aug 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/514/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. Sri Sriram Bharath, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, this appeal is also dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA ANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A.No.514 of 2014 DATED:5.8.2014 Between:The Commissioner of Income Tax-VI,Hyderabad. And Sri Sriram BharathH.No.16-4-06, Fort Road,Warangal District. … Appellant ….Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA ANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A.No.514 of 2014 Judgment :(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) On identical issue, this Court has dismissed an appeal, being, I.T.T.A. No. 295 of 2014. Hence, this appeal is also dismissed. The miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall also stand closed. No costs. __________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ _________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 5[th] August, 2014 pnb HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH MAIN CASE NO: Writ Petition No.16895 of 2001 PROCEEDING SHEET

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.