Itta/5/2025 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central v. M/S. Sushee Infra And Mining Limited
High Court
07 Apr 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/5/2025 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central v. M/S. Sushee Infra And Mining Limited
Date of order
07 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/5/2025 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central v. M/S. Sushee Infra And Mining Limited, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Therefore, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed in termsof the aforesaid Circular No.9 of 2024 dated 17.Og.2O24.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
t
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRILTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYTHE HoNo,RABLE sRr,rrril=o*o*sr NG RAo NANDTKoN DA
tNcoME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 5 OF 2O25
Income Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 2604 of the lncome Tax Act,1961Assessment aggrieved by the [year ]Order dated^27 .12 2oZS passeO-in i.i n. f.f o t33tHyDt202O tor the2017-201g on the rire ot ine income Tax Apperate Tribunar,Hyderabad Bench [,A,, ]Hyderabad.
Between:
The Principal Commissioner of lncome Tax_Central, Hyderabad
...APPELLANT
AND
M/s. 12,Banjaru Sushee Infra and Mining Limited, Hitrs, Hyderabad: pAN N; plot diib:s#tjti''No. 246/A, MLAColony, Road No
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant:Ms. B. Sapna Reddy,standing CounselRep.Smt. K. Mamata Choudary
Counsel forthe Respondent: SRI p SOMA SHEKAR REDDY
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
SAM K TH [,BLE SRI JUSTIC][EP.]ANDNARSING RAO NAN[D]IKONDA[ [ SRI][ JUSTICE]][[ SRI][ JUSTICE]][[ JUSTICE]]
THE [N'B][ [ SRI][ JUSTICE]][[ SRI][ JUSTICE]][[ JUSTICE]]
ETAX [ No.5][ o] [2025]
INC
JUD [NTi ][fper ][rlon'ble ][Sn ][Justice ] [Sdm ][Kosh!)]Heard [Ms.B'Sapna Reddy' Iearned Standing Counsel ][for ][Income]Tax, [aPPearing on][ behalf ][of ][the aPPellart']
The [[instant ][appeal ][under ]][[appeal ][under ]][[under ]][Sectio ][n ][260A ][of ][the ][income ][Tax ][Act']
2. The [[instant ][appeal ][under ]][[appeal ][under ]][[under ]]1961, [has ][been ][preferred by ][the ][Revenue as ][the ][appellalt ][against ][the]order [dated ][27.r2.2023 ][passed ][by ][the ][Income ][Tax ][Appenate ][Tribunal,]Hyderabad ["4" ][tsench' ][Hyderabad' ][in ][I'T'A'No'733lHydl2O2O ][for ][the]Assessment [Y eat' ][2077 ][-18 ][']
Centra'l [Board ][of ][Direct ][Taxes ][(CBDT) ][has ][issued ][Circular ][No'9 ][of]
3. Centra'l 2024 [daLed ][17 ]['Og'2024' ][amending ][the ][previous ][Circular No'5 ][of ][2O24]dated [15.03. ][2024, ][by ][further ][enhancing ][the ][monetary ][limits ][for ][hling]appeals [by ][the ][Income ][Tax ][Department before ][the ][Income ][Tax]Appellate [Tribunals' ][High Courts ][and ][Supreme ][Court ][as ][a ][measure for]reducing [litigatton][. In ][ParagraPh ][2][ of ][the ][said ][Circular, ][we ][find ][that]the [monetary ][limit ][rxed ][for ][rrling ][a', ][appeal ][before ][the ][High ][court ][rs]Rs.2.OO [crore]
4' In the instant appea-I, tax effect is well berow the monetary limit.
5. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed in termsof the aforesaid Circular No.9 of 2024 dated 17.Og.2O24. However, ifthe appeal comes within the exception of Circular No.5 of 2024, itwould be open to the Income Tax Department to seek revival of theappeal. No costs.
6. As a sequel,miscellaneous applications pending if any, shallstand closed.
D/- B. JOINT JOINT
,TRUE
ECTION
To,
1 . The [lncome Tax Appellate ][Tribunal' ][Hyderabad Bench ]['A" ][Hyderabad]
2. One [to SRl. ] [Advocate IOPUCI]
3. One [to ][Smt ] [Mamata Choudary' ][Sr' ][Standing Counsel ][ ]
4. Two [CD CoPies]
TPK/gh
W
HIGH COURT
I
DATED:0710412025
JUDGMENT|TTA.No.S of [2025]
(oG[1HE ][r-i ][I, i]5//jI22ruEM/
ITTA IS DISMISSED
Gr"{D<T^-""
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.