Itta/524/2016 Of The Prl.commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. Pegasystems World Wide India Pvt Ltd
High Court
14 Feb 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/524/2016 Of The Prl.commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. Pegasystems World Wide India Pvt Ltd
Date of order
14 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/524/2016 Of The Prl.commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. Pegasystems World Wide India Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Therefore, the appeal filed by the Department is dismissed interms of the aforesaid Circular No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024.However, if the appeal comes within the exception of CircularNo.5 of 2024, it would be open to the Incorne T'ax Depar.trnent toseek revival ofthe appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABADFRIDAY, DAY OF FEBRUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYANDTHE HON'BLE RAO NANDIKONDA
ITTA No: 524 of 2016
Appeal filed [under Section ][260(A) ][of the ][lncome-Tax ]Act, 1961, against theorder dated 16-10-2015 [passed ][in ][lTA.No.1758lHydl2014 ]for the assessment year2O1O-2011 on the file [of the ][lncome Tax ]Appeltate Tribunal Hyderabad Bench ['B',]Hyderabad.
Between:
The Prl. Commissioner [of lncome Tax-4, ][Hyderabad]
...AppellanURespondent
AND
Pvt Ltd DLF cvbercitv' 3'd rroor' Brock No 2'' 3::^?f,tff5i%'|.,ffiit#33J!: [" ]' 3::^?f,tff5i%'|.,ffiit#33J!: [" ]
...RespondenUAppella nt
Counsel for the Appellant: [Ms. ][B. Sapna Reddy, ]Juriior Standing Counselrepresenting Mr. J.V. [Prasad, Senior ][Standing ]Counsel for lncome TaxDepartmentrepresenting Mr. J.V. [Prasad, Senior ][Standing ]Counsel for lncome TaxDepartment
Counsel for the Respondent: [Mr. ][A.V.Raghu ][Ram, ]learned counselrepresenting Mr. Dokuru Prabhakar Reddyrepresenting Mr. Dokuru Prabhakar Reddy
The Court delivered [the ][following: ]
THE HONOURABLE Szu JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHTANDTHE I'IOT-oURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAICNANDIKONDA
ITTA No.524 OF 2016
JUDGMENT
iur [IIon'ble ][Sri ][Justice ][P.Sam Koshy)]
Hear,C Ms. B.Sapna Reddy, leamed Junior Standing
Counsel represerrting Mr. J.V.Prasad, learned Senior StandingCounsel for the lncome Tax Department for the appellanl andMr.A.V.Rarghu liarn, learned counsel, representing Mr. Dc,kuruPrabhakar Reddr'. Iearned counsel for the respondent. Perused therecord
2. This appeal under Section 260,4. of the Income Tar. Act,1961, has beer pref-erred by the Revenue as the appellantagainst the crdcr dated 16. 10.2015 passed by the Incomt: TaxAppellate TribLural, Hyderabad Bench 'B', Hyderaba<I,lnI.T.A.No. 175 il lHyd,l20l4 lor the Assessment Year 2010- t 13. Central uozrrd ol- Direct Taxes (CBDl') has issued Ci-cularNo.9 of 20-14 drLted 17.09.2024, amending the previous CircularNo.5 of 2024 dated 15.03.2024,by further enhancing the morretarylimits for filing ap,peals by the Income Tax Department befor.e the
I,
Income Tax Appellate Tribunals, High Courts and Supreme Courtas a measure for reducing litigation. In paragraph 2 of the saidCircular, we find that the monetary limit fixed for filing an appealbefore the I{igh Court is Rs.2.00 crore.Circular, we find that the monetary limit fixed for filing an appealbefore the I{igh Court is Rs.2.00 crore.
4In the instant appeal, tax effect is well below the monetarvlimit.limit.
5. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Department is dismissed interms of the aforesaid Circular No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024.However, if the appeal comes within the exception of CircularNo.5 of 2024, it would be open to the Incorne T'ax Depar.trnent toseek revival ofthe appeal. There shall be no order as to costs.
6Consequently, misccllaneous petitions pending, if any, shallstand closed.stand closed.
Sd/. A.V.S.S.C.S,M. SARMAOINT REGISTRARSECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To,
'1 . The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad Bench 'B', Hyderabad.2. One CC to Mr. J.V. Prasad, Senior Standing Counsel for lncome Tax[OpUC]3. One CC to Mr. Dokuru Prabhakar Reddy, Advocate TOPUC]
4. Two CD Copies
kamigh
{P
HIGH
DATED:1410212025
JUDGMENTlTTA.No.524 [a[2016]
DISMISSING THE APPEAI..
I[bw]
tiSt,r''e+i-)O 4 APH ;,ffi:.ili.t*.{ ol-:i'l: f(0
\
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.