Case LawHigh Court › Itta/525/2016 Of The Principal Comm. Of...

Itta/525/2016 Of The Principal Comm. Of Income Tax-1, Hyderabad v. M/S Adp Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad

High Court 13 Jun 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/525/2016 Of The Principal Comm. Of Income Tax-1, Hyderabad v. M/S Adp Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad
Date of order
13 Jun 2022
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/525/2016 Of The Principal Comm. Of Income Tax-1, Hyderabad v. M/S Adp Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: That being the [position, ]the related appeal is [dismissed on withdrawal] lnterlocutory Applications [pending, ]if any, shall stand [closed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD IVONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JUNETWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYANANDTHE HON'BLE MRS, JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 525 oF 2016 lncome Tax Triburial Appeal Under Section 260-A of the lncome Tax Act,1961 against the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ['B',]Hyderabad in lTA.No.'1560/HYDl20'lO for assessment year 2006-07 dated23.12.2015 preferred against the order of the Additional Commissioner of lncomeTax (Transfer Pricing), Hyderabad PAN/GIR No. dated 30.10.2009. Between: The Principal Commissioner of lncome Tax-|, Hyderabad. 1 ...APPELLANT AND M/s. ADP P\i,t. Ltd.,6-3-1091/C/1 , Fortune 9, Raj Bhavan Road , Hyderabad-500082. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: SRI B. NARASIMHA SARMCounsel forthe Respondent: NONE APPEAREDThe Court made the following: ORDER \ THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL ANDTHE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI ITTA.NO.525 0F 2016 ORDE lPer the Hon'ble Sri Justice tliial Bhuvan) Heard Mr. B.Narasimha Sarma [learned Standing Counsel ][for ][lncome]Tax Department for the appellant None appears for the respondent. Mr. B.Narasimha Sarma, learned Standing [Counsel submits ][on ][the]basis of written instructions [dated ][07.06.2022 ][that ][the ][appeal ][filed ][by ][the]Revenue is required to be withdrawn [as ][the ][issue ][is ][covered ][under'Vivad ][Se]Vishwas' scheme. That being the [position, ]the related appeal is [dismissed on withdrawal] lnterlocutory Applications [pending, ]if any, shall stand [closed. No order]as t6 costs SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAOJOINT REGISTRARi\I [t[|- ]-1,\.t\r [l.-]SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,'1. The Chairman, lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad [Bench 'B',]Hyderabad.2. The Additional Commissioner [of ][lncome ][Tax, ][Hyderabad.]g. On" CC to Sri B. Narasimha Sarma, SC for l.T. Dept. 4. Two CD Copies5. One Spare [CoPY]gbr\. HIGH COURT DATED: 1310612022 ORDER ITTA.No.S25 of 2016 DISMISSING THE ITTAAS WITHDRAWNWITHOUT COSTS @dK* 1rre [Sr][4r€]I1<IkJoo[9 Nt]\I 2M,,ti>rtDr:,; ct-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan